• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型制剂FZ. 560对症治疗消化系统疾病的双盲对照试验。

Double-blind controlled trial of the new preparation FZ. 560 in the symptomatic treatment of digestive disorders.

作者信息

Porsio A, Borgia M

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm. 1976 Jul;14(1):40-3.

PMID:61952
Abstract

A controlled double-blind clinical trial was carried out to compare the effects of a new combination FZ. 560 in the symptomatic treatment of digestive disorders including a wide variety of symptoms. The combination contained fentonium bromide, 10 mg, dehydrocholic acid, 25 mg, pancreatin 3FU, 50 mg, and lactulose, 200 mg; it was compared with fentonium bromide 10 mg, and the other components. The three treatment groups included 37 patients, treated for a maximum of 14 days. The severity of the painful and dyspeptic symptoms was recorded daily; the overall daily scores were analyzed using persistence curves. A 50% reduction of the initial overall scores was observed in all the 12 patients in the combination groups by the third treatment day, but not until the 13th day in the fentonium group, while a 50% reduction in symptom intensity was not achieved during the trial in 7.7% of the group treated with the other components. Statistical comparison with the Wilcoxon test showed in fact that the effects of FZ. 560 were significantly superior to those of the two control preparations which did not differ significantly. These results, therefore, demonstrate clearly the advantages of the new combination FZ. 560.

摘要

开展了一项对照双盲临床试验,以比较新型复方制剂FZ. 560对包括多种症状在内的消化系统疾病进行对症治疗的效果。该复方制剂含有10毫克溴芬铵、25毫克去氢胆酸、50毫克3FU胰酶和200毫克乳果糖;将其与10毫克溴芬铵及其他成分进行比较。三个治疗组各有37名患者,治疗最长时间为14天。每天记录疼痛和消化不良症状的严重程度;使用持续曲线分析每日总分。复方制剂组的所有12名患者在治疗第3天时初始总分均降低了50%,而溴芬铵组直到第13天才降低50%,使用其他成分治疗的组中有7.7%在试验期间症状强度未降低50%。事实上,通过威尔科克森检验进行的统计学比较表明,FZ. 560的效果明显优于两种对照制剂,而这两种对照制剂之间无显著差异。因此,这些结果清楚地证明了新型复方制剂FZ. 560的优势。

相似文献

1
Double-blind controlled trial of the new preparation FZ. 560 in the symptomatic treatment of digestive disorders.新型制剂FZ. 560对症治疗消化系统疾病的双盲对照试验。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm. 1976 Jul;14(1):40-3.
2
[Controlled clinical study of a new preparation for the treatment of digestive disorders].[一种治疗消化系统疾病新制剂的对照临床研究]
Minerva Gastroenterol. 1975 Jan-Mar;21(1):31-4.
3
Controlled double-blind trial on the clinical effects of the chenodeoxycholic acid-fentonium bromide combination in the symptomatic treatment of biliary spastic-dyskinetic conditions.鹅去氧胆酸与溴芬铵联合用药对症治疗胆道痉挛性运动障碍临床效果的对照双盲试验
Arzneimittelforschung. 1977;27(6):1226-30.
4
[Clinical evaluation of a new preparation with digestive-antispastic activity].[一种具有消化-解痉活性的新制剂的临床评估]
Minerva Gastroenterol. 1972 Jan-Mar;18(1):35-44.
5
[The effect and tolerance of a gall-enzyme preparation].
Med Welt. 1978 Jan 27;29(4):144-9.
6
[Clinical research on a new preparation with digestive-antispastic activity].[一种具有消化-解痉活性的新制剂的临床研究]
Minerva Gastroenterol. 1972 Jan-Mar;18(1):18-26.
7
[Comparison of the clinical activity of an enzymatic-choleretic-tensioactive complex in association with metoclopramide and the same complex without metoclopramide].[酶促利胆活性复合物联合甲氧氯普胺与不含甲氧氯普胺的相同复合物的临床活性比较]
Minerva Med. 1973 Apr 4;64(21):1104-7.
8
[Digestive insufficiency and its treatment with a new three-phase enzyme drug].[消化功能不全及其用新型三相酶药物的治疗]
Landarzt. 1968 Aug 31;44(24):1156-61.
9
[Controlled clinical trial (with a sequential method) of a combination of metoclopramide and an enzymatic choleretico-tensio-active complex in dyspeptic syndromes].[甲氧氯普胺与一种酶促胆汁分泌-张力活性复合物联合治疗消化不良综合征的(序贯法)对照临床试验]
Clin Ter. 1972 Mar 31;60(6):535-60.
10
A double-blind trial of fentonium bromide in the treatment of incontinent unstable bladder.溴化芬托铵治疗尿失禁型不稳定膀胱的双盲试验。
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1986 Aug;24(8):421-4.