Belott P H, Sands S, Warren J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1984 Mar;7(2):169-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1984.tb04882.x.
Multiprogrammable pacemakers have long been subject to inappropriate reprogramming and electromagnetic interference (EMI). A limited clinical experience with DDD pacing systems precludes the significance of such phenomena in these units. Since August 1981, in a series of 140 DDD systems, certain units demonstrated consistent and reproducible resetting to the back-up modes caused by electrocautery. One unit was permanently reset to the VOO mode. These observations suggest the need for renewed caution at the time of surgery; they also underscore the importance of a thorough understanding of any DDD system and careful follow-up so that such phenomena will not be misinterpreted as pacemaker failure, resulting in erroneous pacemaker removal.
多程控起搏器长期以来一直存在不适当的重新编程和电磁干扰（EMI）问题。DDD起搏系统的临床经验有限，尚无法确定此类现象在这些装置中的重要性。自1981年8月以来，在140套DDD系统中，某些装置表现出因电灼而持续且可重复地重置为备用模式。有一台装置被永久性重置为VOO模式。这些观察结果表明在手术时需要再次谨慎；它们还强调了全面了解任何DDD系统并进行仔细随访的重要性，以免此类现象被误解为起搏器故障，导致错误地移除起搏器。
