Suppr超能文献

[头颈部癌症的初始多药化疗。48例患者中两种非随机联合方案的疗效与耐受性]

[Initial polychemotherapy in the treatment of cancers of the head and neck. The efficacy and tolerance of 2 nonrandomized combinations in 48 patients].

作者信息

Brun B, Mazeron J J, Martin M, Lelièvre G, Langlois A, Feuillade F, Lebourgeois J P, Peynegre R, Grellet M, Pierquin B

出版信息

Bull Cancer. 1984;71(1):30-4.

PMID:6201214
Abstract

Before loco regional treatment for head and neck cancer forty eight patients received one or the other of the following combined chemotherapy regimens: Regimen A (28 patients): high dosage methotrexate, bleomycin, cis-platin; regimen B (20 patients): common dosage methotrexate, bleomycin, hydroxyurea, vincristin. The effectiveness of regimen A seemed better than that of regimen B (46% responses versus 20%). This assessment must be accepted with caution, since, although the organization of treatment was strictly similar in the two groups, the study was not randomized, and there were noticeable differences between the two groups. Regimen B was associated with no toxicity. Regimen A was responsible for two fatalities. These two cases were linked to high dosage methotrexate. However, a combined chemotherapy regimen of type A with the high dosage methotrexate replaced by intermediate dosage methotrexate, seems feasible to us. Loco regional treatment was not impaired by initial chemotherapy with either regimen.

摘要

在对头颈部癌进行局部区域治疗之前,48例患者接受了以下联合化疗方案中的一种:方案A(28例患者):高剂量甲氨蝶呤、博来霉素、顺铂;方案B(20例患者):常规剂量甲氨蝶呤、博来霉素、羟基脲、长春新碱。方案A的有效性似乎优于方案B(缓解率分别为46%和20%)。由于尽管两组的治疗安排严格相似,但该研究并非随机研究,且两组之间存在显著差异,因此对这一评估必须谨慎接受。方案B无毒性。方案A导致两例死亡。这两例与高剂量甲氨蝶呤有关。然而,对我们来说,将方案A中的高剂量甲氨蝶呤替换为中等剂量甲氨蝶呤的联合化疗方案似乎是可行的。局部区域治疗未因两种方案中的任何一种初始化疗而受到影响。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Chemotherapeutic management of head and neck cancer.
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1987;6(3):181-98. doi: 10.1007/BF00144263.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验