Suppr超能文献

言语障碍的功能评估。

The functional assessment of verbal impairment.

作者信息

Sarno M T

出版信息

Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1983;9:75-81.

PMID:6202004
Abstract

Standard measures do not generally account for functional communication performance. Traditionally the measures used to assess verbal impairment in the brain-damaged patient generally sample performance under artificial conditions rather than the unforced , voluntary, and habitual utterances which characterize natural language use. An awareness of the potential for functional communication in even the most severely brain-damaged patients requires enlightened medical management. Man is a social being capable of communicating in many ways other than the verbal mode. Under appropriate circumstances, with guidance and encouragement, he can and does accommodate and adjust. Communication assessment must go beyond the restricted information derived from standardized language tests. In practical terms, this means that rehabilitation evaluations must incorporate observations of the aphasic or dysarthric patient in his natural environment as a part of the overall communication assessment or using an established measure of functional communication. It is hard to imagine that a functional philosophy is not universally implemented. The speech pathology literature is a clear case in point.

摘要

标准测量方法通常并未考虑功能性沟通表现。传统上,用于评估脑损伤患者言语障碍的测量方法一般是在人为条件下对其表现进行抽样,而非针对自然语言使用中具有特征性的自发、自愿和习惯性言语。即便对于脑损伤最严重的患者,也要意识到其具备功能性沟通的潜力,这就需要明智的医疗管理。人类是社会性动物,除了言语模式外,还能够通过多种方式进行交流。在适当的情况下,在指导和鼓励下,他能够并且确实会做出适应和调整。沟通评估必须超越标准化语言测试所提供的有限信息。实际上,这意味着康复评估必须将对失语或构音障碍患者在其自然环境中的观察纳入整体沟通评估,或者采用已确立的功能性沟通测量方法。很难想象一种功能性理念没有得到普遍应用。言语病理学文献就是一个明显的例子。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验