Den Dulk K, Bertholet M, Brugada P, Bär F W, Demoulin J C, Waleffe A, Bakels N, Lindemans F, Bourgeois I, Kulbertus H E
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1984 May;7(3 Pt 2):548-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1984.tb04949.x.
Pacing is becoming an accepted form of treatment for reentry tachycardias. The different pacing modalities available and experience with a patient-activated antitachycardia pacemaker are presented in this paper. This system has bidirectional communication between pacemaker and pacemaker-activator and between pacemaker and prescription formulator (which is a sophisticated portable stimulator used for non-invasive electrophysiological evaluation of the system). This pacemaker was implanted in 18 patients with drug-resistant tachycardias. Six patients had ventricular tachycardia, 3 had A-V nodal reentrant tachycardia, 4 had the concealed accessory pathway, and 5 had the WPW syndrome. In the 3 months before implantation the mean number of admissions for termination of tachycardia was 2.1 per patient-month. During a follow-up period of 3-26 months only 6 patients were admitted once for termination of tachycardia (0.02 admissions per patient-month). The reasons for admission of these 6 patients were: defective pacemaker activator in 2 patients, inadequate control of tachycardia in 2 patients, inappropriate use of the device in 1, and inadequate intake of medication in 1. All these problems were solved easily. Eight pacemaker activators required reprogramming, which was done in 5 patients on an out-patient basis. The interval scanning mode was used in 9 patients. Nine patients required more than 2 stimuli for reproducible termination. A step-wise increase in number of stimuli was used in 5 patients. This system has proven to be a safe and effective form of treatment of drug-resistant supraventricular and ventricular tachycardias and has resulted in marked improvement of the quality of life of these patients.
起搏正成为折返性心动过速一种被认可的治疗方式。本文介绍了现有的不同起搏方式以及患者激活型抗心动过速起搏器的应用经验。该系统在起搏器与起搏器激活器之间以及起搏器与处方制定器(一种用于系统无创电生理评估的精密便携式刺激器)之间具有双向通信。18例耐药性心动过速患者植入了这种起搏器。其中6例为室性心动过速,3例为房室结折返性心动过速,4例为隐匿性旁道,5例为预激综合征。植入前3个月,每位患者每月因终止心动过速入院的平均次数为2.1次。在3至26个月的随访期内,只有6例患者因终止心动过速入院一次(每位患者每月0.02次入院)。这6例患者入院的原因分别为:2例起搏器激活器故障,2例心动过速控制不佳,1例设备使用不当,1例药物摄入不足。所有这些问题都很容易解决。8个起搏器激活器需要重新编程,其中5例在门诊完成。9例患者使用了间期扫描模式。9例患者需要超过2次刺激才能重复终止心动过速。5例患者采用了刺激次数逐步增加的方法。该系统已被证明是治疗耐药性室上性和室性心动过速的一种安全有效的方式,并显著改善了这些患者的生活质量。