Stoehr M, Friedel G, Engel P, Goerttler K, Futterman G
Arzneimittelforschung. 1984;34(4):451-4.
The cytokinetic response of Ehrlich ascites tumor (EAT) cells in vivo upon chronic treatment at low dosage levels with cytarabine (1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine, ara-c) bleomycin (BLM) and peplomycin (PEP) was estimated. Bivariate DNA histograms allow the simultaneous evaluation of the cell cycle status of living and killed cells. It could be confirmed that ara-C is cytostatic on cells in S phase. Pronounced cytotoxicity was observed in G1 and G2+M phase. BLM and PEP showed no (or neglectable ) accumulation of vital cells in any cycle phase. Both drugs, however, are cytotoxic on cells, regardless their position within the cell cycle. A successive application of ara-C and BLM (or PEP) in a cell kinetics-directed therapy schedule may be taken into account.
评估了用阿糖胞苷(1-β-D-阿拉伯呋喃糖基胞嘧啶,ara-c)、博来霉素(BLM)和培普利霉素(PEP)在低剂量水平对艾氏腹水瘤(EAT)细胞进行长期体内治疗后的细胞动力学反应。双变量DNA直方图可同时评估活细胞和死细胞的细胞周期状态。可以确认,阿糖胞苷对S期细胞具有细胞生长抑制作用。在G1期和G2+M期观察到明显的细胞毒性。BLM和PEP在任何细胞周期阶段均未显示(或可忽略不计)活细胞的积累。然而,这两种药物对细胞均具有细胞毒性,无论其在细胞周期中的位置如何。可以考虑在细胞动力学导向的治疗方案中连续应用阿糖胞苷和BLM(或PEP)。