Pierce R S
Brain Lang. 1984 Jul;22(2):339-49. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(84)90098-1.
This study assessed 13 aphasic subjects' knowledge of the multiple meanings of homographs. The results indicated that the various meanings were less available to aphasic subjects than to normal subjects. In addition, specific meanings became less available as they became less typical although the number of meanings associated with a homograph did not influence performance. Aphasia type also did not influence performance. Performance on the experimental test was significantly correlated with auditory comprehension level and picture naming ability. The results were related to recent findings on semantic organization in aphasia.
本研究评估了13名失语症患者对同形异义词多种含义的认知。结果表明，与正常受试者相比，失语症患者获取各种含义的能力较差。此外，尽管同形异义词的含义数量不影响表现，但随着特定含义变得不那么典型，其可用性也会降低。失语症类型也不影响表现。实验测试的表现与听觉理解水平和图片命名能力显著相关。这些结果与近期关于失语症语义组织的研究结果相关。
