[Studies on prophylaxis and therapy of pivmecillinam against post-prostatectomy urinary tract infection].

Patients received pivmecillinam (PMPC) after prophylactic use of various antimicrobial chemotherapeutic agents following prostatectomy, and their clinical responses were assessed for effectiveness in the treatment and prevention of postoperative infection. The data were also analyzed to explore the relationship between bacterial isolates obtained during the postoperative course and the antimicrobial agents administered prophylactically against postoperative infection. Therapeutic effect of PMPC: Treatment of postoperative infections with PMPC was effective in 36 (53.7%) out of 67 patients who had undergone prostatectomy. Prophylactic effect of PMPC: The use of PMPC provided effective prevention of infection in 22 (64.7%) out of 34 patients from whom no bacterial pathogen had been isolated before postoperative antimicrobial chemotherapy. Therapeutic responses to PMPC, compared between different types of operative procedure: There was little or no difference in therapeutic effectiveness of PMPC against postoperative infection when compared between two types of operative procedure, transurethral prostatectomy and subcapsular removal of the prostate. Incidence and types of bacterial isolates following prophylactic chemotherapy with various agents after prostatectomy: Possibly because cephapirin (CEPR) and ticarcillin (TIPC) were mainly administered, alone or in combination, for prophylaxis against postoperative infection, Serratia and Pseudomonas were most frequently isolated. The findings offer suggestions as to the appropriate combination of antimicrobial agents to be used for prophylactic purposes. Effectiveness of PMPC in the presence or absence of a preoperative indwelling urethral catheter: The use of PMPC was more effective both in the treatment and prevention of postoperative infection in cases without preoperative indwelling urethral catheterization than in those with it.