Obana Y, Nishino T, Tanino T
Jpn J Antibiot. 1983 Feb;36(2):249-59.
A study of the antibacterial action of cefoperazone (CPZ) and piperacillin (PIPC) against E. coli demonstrated clear differences between these 2 drugs. CPZ showed higher bactericidal and lytic activity which was dose dependent and not greatly influenced by inoculum size. In contrast, the activity of PIPC was strongly influenced by inoculum size and showed high bactericidal activity only against a low inoculum size. The activity of CPZ was not related to the pH of the culture medium, whereas PIPC showed increased activity in an acid medium. In a study of the drug sensitive phase of a synchronous culture, CPZ was highly effective during the period of cell division showing strong bactericidal activity at that time. The bactericidal action of CPZ was inhibited by the addition of chloramphenicol. In contrast, PIPC which by itself demonstrated only weak bactericidal activity was not effective during the period of cell division. Although CPZ and PIPC both activate autolysin activity, CPZ was more active in this regard.
一项关于头孢哌酮(CPZ)和哌拉西林(PIPC)对大肠杆菌抗菌作用的研究表明,这两种药物之间存在明显差异。CPZ表现出更高的杀菌和溶菌活性,该活性呈剂量依赖性,且受接种量大小的影响不大。相比之下,PIPC的活性受接种量大小的强烈影响,仅对低接种量显示出高杀菌活性。CPZ的活性与培养基的pH值无关,而PIPC在酸性培养基中活性增加。在一项对同步培养物药物敏感阶段的研究中,CPZ在细胞分裂期非常有效,此时显示出很强的杀菌活性。添加氯霉素可抑制CPZ的杀菌作用。相比之下,本身仅表现出微弱杀菌活性的PIPC在细胞分裂期无效。虽然CPZ和PIPC都能激活自溶素活性,但在这方面CPZ更具活性。