Suppr超能文献

哮喘患者中支气管扩张剂药物常规雾化与超声雾化的比较。

Comparison of conventional and ultrasonic nebulisation of bronchodilator drugs in asthmatic subjects.

作者信息

Sears M R

出版信息

N Z Med J. 1983 Nov 9;96(743 Pt 2):927-9.

PMID:6226884
Abstract

The effects of ultrasonic and conventional nebulisation of bronchodilator drugs were compared in 20 adults with moderately severe asthma. The bronchodilating effect of fenoterol hydrobromide was not significantly enhanced by ultrasonic nebulisation, and ultrasonic nebulisation of ipratropium bromide gave significantly less bronchodilatation than conventional nebulisation. Despite theoretical reasons why ultrasonic nebulisation of bronchodilator might be more effective than conventional nebulisation, this was not borne out by this study.

摘要

对20名中度重症哮喘成年患者比较了支气管扩张剂药物的超声雾化和传统雾化效果。超声雾化并未显著增强氢溴酸非诺特罗的支气管扩张作用,且异丙托溴铵的超声雾化产生的支气管扩张作用明显小于传统雾化。尽管从理论上讲支气管扩张剂的超声雾化可能比传统雾化更有效,但本研究并未证实这一点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验