Ugolotti U, Mandrioli R, Miselli A, Rossi A, Marchesi G, Denti L
Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense. 1983;54(4):301-10.
In all the patients was performed angiography, while only 11 were studied by the means of Abdominal Ultrasonography. The Authors' aim is to evaluate the accuracy of these two methods and to define a correct diagnostic procedure. The results obtained with Angiography were 15 correct diagnosis and 1 false positive, whereas those obtained with Sonography were 7 correct diagnosis, 2 indicative diagnosis and 2 false negative. Therefore, when a patient is clinically suspected of having a traumatic spleen injury, the Authors suggest to perform an Abdominal Sonography at first. In case of evident spleen lesion, laparatomy will be directly carried out. However, if the sonographic result is negative or aspecific, it will be necessary for the patient to undergo Angiography in order to rule out possible false negative or establish the origin of endoabdominal bleeding correctly.
所有患者均接受了血管造影,而只有11例患者接受了腹部超声检查。作者的目的是评估这两种方法的准确性,并确定正确的诊断程序。血管造影的结果是15例诊断正确,1例假阳性,而超声检查的结果是7例诊断正确,2例疑似诊断,2例假阴性。因此,当临床上怀疑患者有外伤性脾损伤时,作者建议首先进行腹部超声检查。如果脾脏病变明显,将直接进行剖腹手术。然而,如果超声检查结果为阴性或不明确,患者有必要接受血管造影,以排除可能的假阴性或正确确定腹腔内出血的来源。