Suppr超能文献

齐美利定、丙咪嗪和安慰剂治疗原发性情感障碍患者的双盲对照评估。

A double-blind, controlled evaluation of zimeldine, imipramine and placebo in patients with primary affective disorders.

作者信息

Merideth C H, Feighner J P

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1983;308:70-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb11104.x.

Abstract

Zimeldine, imipramine and placebo were studied in a randomized, double-blind, parallel group comparison of 119 patients with primary affective disorders. These out-patients were between 18 and 65 years of age and all received placebo single-blind during an initial 3-7-day washout period. During the subsequent 6-week double-blind period, patients were titrated from 50 mg b.d. to 150 mg b.d. with zimeldine, a potent and selective inhibitor of 5-HT reuptake, with imipramine, an inhibitor of noradrenaline and 5-HT reuptake, or with a corresponding number of placebo capsules. The zimeldine treatment group had significantly lower mean HAM-D scale total scores than the placebo and imipramine groups at week 4 and last available assessment. There was a significantly greater proportion of patients showing an improvement of 50% or more in HAM-D score, among the zimeldine group than in the placebo group at week 4, and among the imipramine group at weeks 4, 6 and last available assessment. The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scales and the 56-item Hopkins Symptom Check-list (HSCL-56) self-rating inventory both showed significantly more improvement in the zimeldine patients than in the placebo or the imipramine patients. Fewer zimeldine patients reported adverse experiences than imipramine patients. Dry mouth was the most frequently reported adverse experience, occurring significantly more often in the imipramine group than the zimeldine or the placebo groups; significantly more zimeldine than placebo patients reported dry mouth. Headache was the only other adverse experience which occurred more often in the zimeldine than in the placebo group. The imipramine group had consistently higher mean pulse rates than the other two groups, and postural hypotension was also more common in the imipramine group.

摘要

在一项针对119例原发性情感障碍患者的随机、双盲、平行组比较研究中,对齐美利定、丙咪嗪和安慰剂进行了研究。这些门诊患者年龄在18至65岁之间,在最初3至7天的洗脱期内均接受单盲安慰剂治疗。在随后的6周双盲期内,患者用强效5-羟色胺(5-HT)再摄取抑制剂齐美利定、去甲肾上腺素和5-HT再摄取抑制剂丙咪嗪或相应数量的安慰剂胶囊,从每日两次、每次50毫克滴定至每日两次、每次150毫克。在第4周和最后一次可获得的评估时,齐美利定治疗组的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)总分均值显著低于安慰剂组和丙咪嗪组。在第4周时,齐美利定组中HAM-D评分改善50%或更多的患者比例显著高于安慰剂组;在第4周、第6周和最后一次可获得的评估时,丙咪嗪组中该比例也显著高于安慰剂组。临床总体印象量表(CGI)和56项霍普金斯症状清单(HSCL-56)自评量表均显示,齐美利定治疗的患者比安慰剂或丙咪嗪治疗的患者改善更显著。报告不良经历的齐美利定患者少于丙咪嗪患者。口干是最常报告的不良经历,在丙咪嗪组中发生的频率显著高于齐美利定组或安慰剂组;报告口干的齐美利定患者也显著多于安慰剂患者。头痛是另一种在齐美利定组中比安慰剂组更常出现的不良经历。丙咪嗪组的平均脉搏率一直高于其他两组,体位性低血压在丙咪嗪组中也更常见。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验