Potts M, Paxman J M
J Med Ethics. 1984 Mar;10(1):9-20. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.1.9.
Ethical issues relating to the use of the injectable contraceptive in developed and developing countries alike involve public policy decisions concerning both criteria for testing a new drug and individual choices about using a specific form of contraception approved for national distribution. Drug testing consists of an important but still evolving set of procedures. Depo-Provera is not qualitatively different from any other drug and some unpredictable risks are inevitable, even after extensive animal experiments and clinical trials. In assessing the risks and benefits of Depo-Provera use, epidemiological data from large-scale human use is now beginning to become more important than data from animal experiments and clinical trials. The consumer's best interest is central to any ethically responsible system of drug distribution. Systems of informed choice are needed, even in societies where illiteracy remains common and medical services are weak. In the case of a contraceptive, the risks of non-use leading to unintended pregnancy, which can result in high mortality, are relevant as well as the side-effects of the method. An attempt, therefore, is made here to categorise those issues which are universal and those which are country-specific.
在发达国家和发展中国家,与使用注射用避孕药相关的伦理问题都涉及到有关新药测试标准的公共政策决策以及个人对于使用已批准在国内销售的特定避孕方式的选择。药物测试包含一系列重要但仍在不断发展的程序。醋酸甲羟孕酮与其他任何药物在性质上并无不同,即使经过广泛的动物实验和临床试验,一些不可预测的风险仍不可避免。在评估使用醋酸甲羟孕酮的风险和益处时,来自大规模人体使用的流行病学数据如今开始比来自动物实验和临床试验的数据更为重要。消费者的最大利益对于任何符合伦理责任的药物分发系统来说都是核心。即使在文盲现象仍然普遍且医疗服务薄弱的社会中,也需要有知情选择的体系。就避孕药具而言,不使用导致意外怀孕的风险(这可能导致高死亡率)以及该方法的副作用都与之相关。因此,本文试图对那些具有普遍性的问题和特定国家的问题进行分类。