Smeraldi E, Petroccione A, Gasperini M, Macciardi F, Orsini A, Kidd K K
J Affect Disord. 1984 Apr;6(2):139-51. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(84)90019-3.
From a genetic point of view, the application of mathematical models to affective disorders has not yet been useful, since they do not indicate a specific mode of transmission. To use these models correctly, we need to identify homogeneous genetic subgroups among those sharing the common phenotypic feature of affective illness. Our useful criterion for this is outcome on long-term lithium therapy, since experimental data suggest the existence of a close relationship between the genetic mechanisms that underly the affective disorders and those that underly outcome on lithium. We have studied 145 subjects with primary affective disorders, 92 of whom did not relapse during lithium treatment and 53 of whom did, together with 864 of their first-degree relatives. The data for both groups fit both single major locus and multifactorial polygenic models for genetic analysis, including a sex effect and therefore neither mode of transmission can be excluded.
从遗传学角度来看,数学模型在情感障碍中的应用尚未发挥作用,因为它们并未表明特定的遗传模式。为了正确使用这些模型,我们需要在具有情感疾病共同表型特征的人群中识别出同质的遗传亚组。对此我们有用的标准是长期锂盐治疗的结果,因为实验数据表明,情感障碍背后的遗传机制与锂盐治疗结果背后的遗传机制之间存在密切关系。我们研究了145例原发性情感障碍患者,其中92例在锂盐治疗期间未复发,53例复发,同时还研究了他们的864名一级亲属。两组数据均符合用于遗传分析的单主基因座模型和多基因多因素模型,包括性别效应,因此两种遗传模式都不能排除。