de Louvois J, Mulhall A, Hurley R
J Clin Pathol. 1980 Jun;33(6):575-80. doi: 10.1136/jcp.33.6.575.
Eight methods for the assay of chloramphenicol in clinical samples were compared with our own modification of a plate diffusion technique using Sarcina lutea and yeast extract agar. Six of the eight methods were less sensitive than originally reported, and five of them were considered unsuitable for use in clinical microbiology practice. The remaining three methods together with the S. lutea/yeast extract modification were used to assay chloramphenicol in 20 samples of serum. Twenty samples of cerebrospinal fluid were also assayed by the S. lutea/yeast extract method. Our results indicate that only the Bacillus subtilis (sensitivity 6x0 mg/l) and the S. lutea (sensitivity 2x5 mg/l) diffusion methods are suitable for use with clinical samples in routine practice. The problems of chloramphenicol toxicity, appropriate dosage regimens, and the need for assay of the drugs are considered.
将临床样本中氯霉素的八种检测方法与我们自己改良的使用藤黄八叠球菌和酵母提取物琼脂的平板扩散技术进行了比较。八种方法中的六种比最初报道的灵敏度低,其中五种被认为不适用于临床微生物学实践。其余三种方法与藤黄八叠球菌/酵母提取物改良法一起用于检测20份血清样本中的氯霉素。还用藤黄八叠球菌/酵母提取物法检测了20份脑脊液样本。我们的结果表明,只有枯草芽孢杆菌(灵敏度6×0毫克/升)和藤黄八叠球菌(灵敏度2×5毫克/升)扩散法适用于常规临床样本检测。文中还考虑了氯霉素毒性、合适的给药方案以及药物检测需求等问题。