• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[与肺活量相比,25 - 75%最大呼气流量(MEF 25 - 75与VC的比值)在检测小气道通气障碍中的价值]

[Value of 25-75 percent maximum expiratory flow as compared with vital capacity (ratio of MEF 25-75 to VC) in the detection of ventilatory disorders of the small air passages].

作者信息

Wipf R

出版信息

Rev Ig Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol Pneumoftiziol Pneumoftiziol. 1981 Jan-Mar;30(1):15-22.

PMID:6264565
Abstract

The author has investigated the feasibility of DME 25--75/C.V. as a test for the detection of ventilatory disturbances of the small aerial pathways, by comparing the results with those of other tests considered to be very sensitive, such as Vmax 50% and 25% of C.V., Vmax 50% and 25% of C.V. of an air curve and that of a He-O2 mixture (80%--20%), and the isoflow volume. The study was carried out in 90 subjects, divided in two groups in relation to the values obtained by the DME 25--75/C.V., as follows : 44 subjects with bronchial obstruction and 46 subjects showing functional signs of obstruction of the small aerial pathways. The results have indicated that the two populations classified according to this criterium are statistically different also with regard to other tests applied, indicating the feasibility of the test under study, which, compared to other tests, has the advantage of higher sensitivity in relation to the simplicity of the device.

摘要

作者通过将DME 25--75/C.V.的检测结果与其他被认为非常敏感的检测结果进行比较,研究了DME 25--75/C.V.作为检测小气道通气障碍的一种测试方法的可行性,这些检测包括Vmax 50%和25%的C.V.、空气曲线及氦氧混合气(80%--20%)的Vmax 50%和25%的C.V.,以及等流量容积。该研究在90名受试者中进行,根据DME 25--75/C.V.获得的值将他们分为两组,如下:44名患有支气管阻塞的受试者和46名显示小气道阻塞功能体征的受试者。结果表明,根据该标准分类的这两个人群在应用的其他检测方面在统计学上也存在差异,这表明所研究的测试方法是可行的,与其他测试相比,该测试方法具有设备简单但灵敏度更高的优势。

相似文献

1
[Value of 25-75 percent maximum expiratory flow as compared with vital capacity (ratio of MEF 25-75 to VC) in the detection of ventilatory disorders of the small air passages].[与肺活量相比,25 - 75%最大呼气流量(MEF 25 - 75与VC的比值)在检测小气道通气障碍中的价值]
Rev Ig Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol Pneumoftiziol Pneumoftiziol. 1981 Jan-Mar;30(1):15-22.
2
[The reliability of the maximal expiratory flow 25-75o/o referred to the vital capacity (MMEF 25-75/VC) in the detection of peripheral ventilatory disorders].[以肺活量为参照的最大呼气流量25%-75%(MMEF 25-75/VC)在检测外周通气障碍中的可靠性]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1980 Dec 6;110(49):1868-9.
3
[Asthma-tobacco interaction and alterations of maximal expiratory flow in air and in helium-oxygen (author's transl)].
Poumon Coeur. 1980 May-Jun;36(3):165-70.
4
[Maximum expiratory flow rate (peak flow) in healthy persons and patients with bronchial asthma].
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1982 Mar-Apr;10(2):91-4.
5
[The value of maximal expiratory flow brought to 25-75% of the vital capacity in the detection of obstruction in the minor airways].
Bronchopneumologie. 1980 Nov-Dec;30(6):485-90.
6
[Tests for the study of the small air passages and their use in aged patients].[用于研究小气道的检测方法及其在老年患者中的应用]
G Clin Med. 1978 Sep-Oct;59(9-10):355-96.
7
[The density-dependence of maximal respiratory flow as an exploratory test of the small airways].[最大呼吸流量的密度依赖性作为小气道的探索性测试]
Recenti Prog Med. 1977 Apr;62(4):389-405.
8
A normal FEV1/VC ratio does not exclude airway obstruction.正常的第一秒用力呼气容积/肺活量比值并不能排除气道阻塞。
Respiration. 2004 Jul-Aug;71(4):348-52. doi: 10.1159/000079638.
9
[Comparative value of different respiratory function tests for the early diagnosis of the respiratory distress syndrome (author's transl)].不同呼吸功能测试对呼吸窘迫综合征早期诊断的比较价值(作者译)
Poumon Coeur. 1982;38(1):17-23.
10
Obstructive flow-volume loop contours after single lung transplantation.单肺移植后的阻塞性流量-容积环轮廓
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1994 May-Jun;13(3):508-13.