Pictorial depth and related constancy effects as a function of recognition.

It is argued that while pictorial cues must be fundamental in the perception of an extended ground plane in daily life (and, by definition, in the perception of depth in pictures), the traditional pictorial cues such as perspective or texture gradients are neither a necessary nor a sufficient basis for it. That they are not necessary was shown by experiments in which such cues were eliminated from pictures representing a scene in depth. Illusory size perception based on localization of objects in depth in such pictures nonetheless occurred. That they are not sufficient was shown by experiments in which photographs of grassy fields did not yield impressions of depth or related size illusions when conditions were such that the scene was not recognized. Once recognized, however, these same pictures did yield such perceptions. It is suggested that a critical step in perceiving depth based on pictorial information is recognition of the scene.