• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Clinical comparison of cefotaxime with gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of peritonitis and other soft-tissue infections.

作者信息

Stone H H, Morris E S, Geheber C E, Kolb L D, Dunlop W E

出版信息

Rev Infect Dis. 1982 Sep-Oct;4 Suppl:S439-43. doi: 10.1093/clinids/4.supplement_2.s439.

DOI:10.1093/clinids/4.supplement_2.s439
PMID:6294796
Abstract

The efficacy and safety of cefotaxime were compared with the efficacy and safety of gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of peritonitis and soft-tissue infection in 112 patients. Patients received 20 mg of intravenous cefotaxime/kg of body weight every 6 hr or 1 mg of gentamicin/kg every 8 hr plus 5 mg of clindamycin/kg every 6 hr (both intravenously). Therapy was continued for five to 10 days. The overall clinical cure rate was 82%, with no significant difference between cure rates in the two groups. Both antibiotic regimens were effective against aerobic and anaerobic isolates, although Pseudomonas aeruginosa, an occasional isolate of Enterobacter, and some anaerobes were resistant to cefotaxime. All clinical failures involved patients who had septicemia or who had received inadequate surgical treatment. Six (11%) of the patients who received combination therapy developed impaired renal function, as indicated by a rise in serum creatinine of 30%. No reduction in renal function was noted in patients given cefotaxime. The clinical efficacy of cefotaxime was equal to that of gentamicin plus clindamycin, and less nephrotoxicity was encountered with cefotaxime.

摘要

相似文献

1
Clinical comparison of cefotaxime with gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of peritonitis and other soft-tissue infections.
Rev Infect Dis. 1982 Sep-Oct;4 Suppl:S439-43. doi: 10.1093/clinids/4.supplement_2.s439.
2
Clinical evaluation of cefotaxime versus gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of polymicrobial peritonitis.头孢噻肟与庆大霉素加克林霉素治疗混合性腹膜炎的临床评估
Clin Ther. 1982;5 Suppl A:1-9.
3
Ceftriaxone versus combined gentamicin and clindamycin for polymicrobial surgical sepsis.头孢曲松与庆大霉素联合克林霉素治疗多微生物外科脓毒症的比较
Am J Surg. 1984 Oct 19;148(4A):30-4.
4
Clinical comparison of cefotaxime versus the combination of gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of polymicrobial soft-tissue surgical sepsis.
Clin Ther. 1982;5 Suppl A:26-31.
5
Prospective randomized study of two different doses of clindamycin admixed with gentamicin in the management of perforated appendicitis.两种不同剂量克林霉素与庆大霉素混合用于治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的前瞻性随机研究。
Am Surg. 1993 Apr;59(4):248-55.
6
Clinical comparison of cefotaxime versus the combination of gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of peritonitis and similar polymicrobial soft-tissue surgical sepsis.
Clin Ther. 1981;4 Suppl A:67-80.
7
Prospective, randomized, comparative trials in the therapy for intraabdominal and female genital tract infections.
Rev Infect Dis. 1984 Mar-Apr;6 Suppl 1:S283-92. doi: 10.1093/clinids/6.supplement_1.s283.
8
Comparison of cefotaxime, cefoxitin and clindamycin plus gentamicin in the treatment of uncomplicated and complicated pelvic inflammatory disease.头孢噻肟、头孢西丁以及克林霉素加庆大霉素治疗单纯性和复杂性盆腔炎的比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Sep;26 Suppl A:37-43. doi: 10.1093/jac/26.suppl_a.37.
9
Clinical experience with cefotaxime in obstetric and gynecologic infections.头孢噻肟在妇产科感染中的临床应用经验。
Rev Infect Dis. 1982 Sep-Oct;4 Suppl:S432-8. doi: 10.1093/clinids/4.supplement_2.s432.
10
Ciprofloxacin vs. cefotaxime regimens for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
Infection. 1995 Sep-Oct;23(5):278-82. doi: 10.1007/BF01716286.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic regimens for secondary peritonitis of gastrointestinal origin in adults.成人胃肠道源性继发性腹膜炎的抗生素治疗方案
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2005(2):CD004539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004539.pub2.
2
Ciprofloxacin vs. cefotaxime regimens for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.
Infection. 1995 Sep-Oct;23(5):278-82. doi: 10.1007/BF01716286.
3
Antibiotic trials in intra-abdominal infections. A critical evaluation of study design and outcome reporting.腹腔内感染的抗生素试验。对研究设计和结果报告的批判性评价。
Ann Surg. 1984 Jul;200(1):29-39. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198407000-00005.
4
A review of the use of cefotaxime in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections, with special reference to gram-positive pathogens.头孢噻肟在治疗皮肤及皮肤结构感染中的应用综述,特别提及革兰氏阳性病原体。
Infection. 1985;13 Suppl 1:S46-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01644218.
5
Cephalosporins in surgery. Prophylaxis and therapy.外科手术中的头孢菌素。预防与治疗。
Drugs. 1987;34 Suppl 2:216-39. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198700342-00016.
6
Comparison of agar dilution, microdilution, and disk elution methods for measuring the synergy of cefotaxime and its metabolite against anaerobes.琼脂稀释法、微量稀释法和纸片洗脱法测定头孢噻肟及其代谢产物对厌氧菌协同作用的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Jun;23(6):1104-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.6.1104-1108.1986.