Triggle D J, Swamy V C
Circ Res. 1983 Feb;52(2 Pt 2):I17-28.
Ca++ serves multiple roles as a regulator and initiator of cellular events. A variety of mechanisms serve to control cellular Ca++ levels and there exists a corresponding diversity of drugs which possess, with varying degrees of potency and selectivity, Ca++-antagonistic properties. Particular interest attaches to a group of agents designated as Ca++-channel or Ca++-entry blockers and includes verapamil, nifedipine, diltiazem, cinnarizine, and prenylamine. These agents function by blockade of the potential dependent Ca++-channel. However, their obvious chemical heterogeneity suggests that several sites and mechanisms of action may exist. A review of some basic questions concerning the action of the Ca++ channel antagonists is presented. The existence of discrete structure-activity relationships is consistent with the concept that these agents have specific sites of action, rather than serving, for example, as, nonspecific membrane-stabilizing agents. This view is further supported by their selectivity of action seen both in tissue selectivity and selectivity of antagonism of agonist responses. Studies of the relationship of these compounds to Ca++ show that they appear to function competitively against Ca++ and to block cellular Ca++ uptake. Moreover, both contractile responses and cellular Ca++ uptake appear equisensitive to these antagonists, providing further evidence that inhibition of Ca++ uptake underlies their inhibition of mechanical response. Of particular importance is the question of selectivity of action. It is quite clear that the Ca++ channel antagonists do not show equal activity toward all Ca++ channels and that major differences in selectivity occur between cardiac and smooth muscle. It is possible that selectivity of antagonism may occur between different vascular beds. Furthermore, Ca++ channels controlling stimulus-secretion coupling appear to be less sensitive to these antagonists than the channels involved in excitation-contraction coupling. Finally, the actions of Ca++ antagonists on non-Ca++-mediated processes, including Na+-dependent and receptor-binding events, are noted. These actions are seen at higher concentrations than those needed to inhibit Ca++ channel events, and their contribution to the therapeutic actions exerted by these antagonists is unknown.
钙离子作为细胞活动的调节者和启动者发挥着多种作用。多种机制可用于控制细胞内钙离子水平,并且存在相应种类繁多的药物,这些药物具有不同程度的效力和选择性,具备钙离子拮抗特性。一类被称为钙离子通道或钙离子内流阻滞剂的药物尤其受到关注,包括维拉帕米、硝苯地平、地尔硫䓬、桂利嗪和普尼拉明。这些药物通过阻断电压依赖性钙离子通道发挥作用。然而,它们明显的化学异质性表明可能存在多个作用位点和作用机制。本文对一些有关钙离子通道拮抗剂作用的基本问题进行了综述。离散的构效关系的存在与这些药物具有特定作用位点的概念一致,而不是像例如非特异性膜稳定剂那样起作用。它们在组织选择性和激动剂反应拮抗选择性方面表现出的作用选择性进一步支持了这一观点。对这些化合物与钙离子关系的研究表明,它们似乎与钙离子竞争性作用并阻断细胞对钙离子的摄取。此外,收缩反应和细胞对钙离子的摄取对这些拮抗剂似乎同样敏感,这进一步证明抑制钙离子摄取是它们抑制机械反应的基础。特别重要的是作用选择性的问题。很明显,钙离子通道拮抗剂对所有钙离子通道的活性并不相同,并且在心脏和平滑肌之间存在选择性的主要差异。不同血管床之间可能也存在拮抗选择性。此外,控制刺激 - 分泌偶联的钙离子通道似乎比参与兴奋 - 收缩偶联的通道对这些拮抗剂更不敏感。最后,提到了钙离子拮抗剂对非钙离子介导过程的作用,包括钠依赖性和受体结合事件。这些作用在高于抑制钙离子通道事件所需的浓度时出现,并且它们对这些拮抗剂所发挥的治疗作用的贡献尚不清楚。