Munson P J
J Recept Res. 1983;3(1-2):249-59. doi: 10.3109/10799898309041939.
Use of computerized analysis techniques for ligand binding data have recently become generally available, and are now used quite routinely. When used appropriately, these tools can improve the precision of the estimated parameters for binding affinity, K, and capacity, R. Furthermore, such programs can also calculate the uncertainty of the estimates e.g., as a percent coefficient of variation (%CV). However, because of unmeasured variability in specific activity, tracer purity, counting efficiency, counter background, efficiency of separation, etc., the actual uncertainty in the parameters K and R is usually much larger than stated. In an attempt to examine the effects of such artifacts, we have developed a computer program which simulates data arising from a number of commonly used experimental designs, and then intentionally distorted with each of these artifacts. Finally, the data are converted to B/F and B and plotted in the conventional Scatchard plot. Distortions revealed in this graph are indicative of the effect each artifact has on the parameter estimates. The computer program is generally written to stimulate the binding of 2 or more ligands to one, two or many classes of independent or cooperative specific sites as well as to nonspecific sites. Thus, the program is applicable in a wide variety of situations. Results show that low tracer purity ("bindability") or low filtration efficiency will significantly alter the measured R value. Poorly determined specific radioactivity may significantly alter the measured K value as well. Imprecise measurement of machine background may result in the spacious appearance of positive cooperativity, or of additional high or low affinity classes of binding sites. Finally, under some circumstances, it is possible to detect and correct for the presence of these artifacts.
计算机分析技术用于配体结合数据的方法最近已普遍可用,并且现在已相当常规地使用。如果使用得当,这些工具可以提高结合亲和力(K)和容量(R)估计参数的精度。此外,此类程序还可以计算估计值的不确定性,例如作为变异系数百分比(%CV)。然而,由于比活度、示踪剂纯度、计数效率、计数器本底、分离效率等存在未测量的变异性,参数K和R的实际不确定性通常比所述的要大得多。为了研究此类假象的影响,我们开发了一个计算机程序,该程序模拟来自许多常用实验设计的数据,然后有意用这些假象中的每一个进行扭曲。最后,将数据转换为B/F和B,并绘制在传统的Scatchard图中。此图中显示的扭曲表明每个假象对参数估计的影响。该计算机程序通常编写为模拟两种或更多种配体与一类、两类或多类独立或协同特异性位点以及非特异性位点的结合。因此,该程序适用于多种情况。结果表明,低示踪剂纯度(“结合能力”)或低过滤效率将显著改变测量的R值。比放射性测定不准确也可能显著改变测量的K值。机器本底测量不精确可能导致出现正协同性或额外的高亲和力或低亲和力结合位点类别。最后,在某些情况下,可以检测并校正这些假象的存在。