Rudomín P, Jiménez I, Solodkin M, Dueñas S
J Neurophysiol. 1983 Oct;50(4):743-69. doi: 10.1152/jn.1983.50.4.743.
The present series of investigations was aimed to disclose the possible sites of action of excitatory and inhibitory inputs on tho-interneuron pathway mediating the primary afferent depolarization (PAD) of group I afferents of extensor muscles in the cat spinal cord. To this end we compared the effects produced by stimulation of segmental and descending pathways on the PAD generated either by stimulation of group I fibers of flexor muscles or by intraspinal microstimulation. It was assumed that under the appropriate conditions the PAD produced by intraspinal microstimulation results from the activation of the last-order interneurons in the PAD pathway and may, therefore, allow detection pathway. The PAD of single group I afferent fibers was determined in barbiturate-anesthetized preparations by measuring the test stimulus current required to maintain a constant probability of antidromic firing. This was achieved by means of a feedback system that continuously adjusted the test stimulus current to the required values. The PAD of individual group Ia gastrocnemius soleus (GS) fibers that is produced by activation of the low-threshold afferents of the posterior biceps and semitendinosus nerve was found to be inhibited by conditioning stimulation of the relatively low-threshold cutaneous fibers and also by stimulation of supraspinal structures such as the ipsilateral brain stem reticular formation, the contralateral red nucleus, and the contralateral pyramidal tract. In contrast, the PAD of group Ia fibers produced by microstimulation applied in the intermediate nucleus could be inhibited only by stimulation of the brain stem reticular formation but not by stimulation of the other descending inputs presently tested or by stimulation of cutaneous nerves. PAD of group Ia fibers was produced also by microstimulation applied within the motor nucleus. However, in most fibers the resulting PAD could not be inhibited either by stimulation of the brain stem reticular formation, the red nucleus, the pyramidal tract, or cutaneous nerves. Stimulation of cutaneous and of flexor muscle nerves of the brain stem reticular formation, the red nucleus, and the pyramidal tract all produced PAD of the group Ib GS fibers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
本系列研究旨在揭示兴奋和抑制性输入在介导猫脊髓伸肌I类传入纤维的初级传入去极化(PAD)的中间神经元通路中的可能作用位点。为此,我们比较了刺激节段性和下行通路对由屈肌I类纤维刺激或脊髓内微刺激所产生的PAD的影响。假定在适当条件下,脊髓内微刺激产生的PAD是由PAD通路中最后一级中间神经元的激活所致,因此可能有助于检测该通路。在巴比妥麻醉的标本中,通过测量维持恒定逆向发放概率所需的测试刺激电流,来测定单根I类传入纤维的PAD。这是通过一个反馈系统实现的,该系统可将测试刺激电流连续调整到所需值。发现由后二头肌和半腱肌神经的低阈值传入纤维激活所产生的单个I a类腓肠肌比目鱼肌(GS)纤维的PAD,受到相对低阈值皮肤纤维的条件刺激以及同侧脑干网状结构、对侧红核和对侧锥体束等脊髓上结构刺激的抑制。相比之下,在中间核施加微刺激所产生的I a类纤维的PAD,仅能被脑干网状结构的刺激所抑制,而不能被目前测试的其他下行输入或皮肤神经的刺激所抑制。I a类纤维的PAD也可由在运动核内施加微刺激产生。然而,在大多数纤维中,由此产生的PAD既不能被脑干网状结构、红核、锥体束或皮肤神经的刺激所抑制。刺激皮肤和屈肌神经以及脑干网状结构、红核和锥体束均产生了I b类GS纤维的PAD。(摘要截短于400字)