Shaw N
Behav Neural Biol. 1983 Jul;38(2):307-12. doi: 10.1016/s0163-1047(83)90310-2.
Rats were taught an aversion to a sucrose taste cue of varying strengths. The concentration of the sucrose solution was either, 10, 7.5, 5, 2.5, 1, 0.5, or 0.25% which the animals drank for 5 min. Thirty minutes later they were poisoned with lithium chloride. On the test day all animals had access to a 10% sucrose solution regardless of the concentration they had drunk on the conditioning day. Animals conditioned with a 10, 7.5, or 5% sucrose cue subsequently displayed an identically strong aversion to the 10% cue. Only those animals conditioned with a sucrose cue which was 1% or less displayed a significantly weaker aversion to the 10% cue. The results are discussed in terms of the theory that interference with taste aversion learning by such agents as pentylenetetrazol and electroconvulsive shock may have their effect by disrupting the gustatory engram. If this assumption is correct then it suggests that the memory of the gustatory cue may be stored, at least prior to poisoning, in a quite labile state and an apparently limited disruption of taste aversion learning may in fact represent a substantial amnesic effect.
研究人员训练大鼠对不同强度的蔗糖味觉线索产生厌恶。蔗糖溶液的浓度分别为10%、7.5%、5%、2.5%、1%、0.5%或0.25%,让动物饮用5分钟。30分钟后,给它们注射氯化锂使其中毒。在测试日,所有动物都能接触到10%的蔗糖溶液,无论它们在条件训练日饮用的是何种浓度的蔗糖溶液。用10%、7.5%或5%蔗糖线索进行条件训练的动物随后对10%的线索表现出同样强烈的厌恶。只有那些用1%或更低浓度蔗糖线索进行条件训练的动物对10%的线索表现出明显较弱的厌恶。研究结果依据以下理论进行讨论:诸如戊四氮和电休克等因素对味觉厌恶学习的干扰可能是通过破坏味觉记忆痕迹来起作用的。如果这一假设正确,那么这表明味觉线索的记忆,至少在中毒之前,处于相当不稳定的状态,而味觉厌恶学习中明显有限的干扰实际上可能代表着显著的遗忘效应。