Zinsmeister V A, Ackerman G A
Tissue Cell. 1983;15(5):673-81. doi: 10.1016/0040-8166(83)90042-3.
In order to determine the extent and variations in surface concavanalin A (CON A) and wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) labeling of different varieties of normal blood cells, gluraraldehyde-fixed human blood cells were exposed to CON A-gold labeled horseradish peroxidase (CON A-HRP-G) and WGA-gold labeled ovomucoid (WGA-OVO-G) histochemical methods. The resultant particulate reaction product permitted assessment of binding and number of gold particles per micrometer of cell surface. Particle counts and data were subjected to statistical analysis. Six subjects (three female and three male) were used and compared in this study. In spite of moderate variations in surface labeling of the various types of leukocytes, erythrocytes and platelets within a given subject, determinations of mean labeling values for similar cell varieties proved quite similar between subjects with the given lectin. WGA and CON A had substantially different labeling densities on the various hemic cells. WGA surface labeling of all types of hemic cells, with the exception of platelets, showed far more labeling than was found with CON A. WGA mean labeling of the grouped subjects was significantly higher for each variety of leukocyte than for either erythrocytes or platelets although this distinction was not always evident in an individual subject. With CON A, mean labeling density for each of hemic cell types showed significant differences between each of the hemic cell varieties. Erythrocytes had only minimal CON A binding while monocyte and platelet populations represented the most reactive of the hemic cells. No difference was noted between corresponding cell varieties in the female vs. male subjects.
为了确定不同种类正常血细胞表面刀豆球蛋白A(CON A)和小麦胚凝集素(WGA)标记的程度及差异,将戊二醛固定的人血细胞采用CON A-金标记辣根过氧化物酶(CON A-HRP-G)和WGA-金标记卵类粘蛋白(WGA-OVO-G)组织化学方法处理。所产生的颗粒状反应产物可用于评估每微米细胞表面的结合情况及金颗粒数量。对颗粒计数和数据进行统计分析。本研究使用并比较了6名受试者(3名女性和3名男性)。尽管在给定受试者体内,各类白细胞、红细胞和血小板的表面标记存在适度差异,但对于给定凝集素,相似细胞种类的平均标记值在不同受试者之间相当相似。WGA和CON A在各类血细胞上的标记密度有很大差异。除血小板外,WGA对所有类型血细胞的表面标记都远多于CON A。对于每种白细胞,分组受试者的WGA平均标记显著高于红细胞或血小板,尽管在个体受试者中这种差异并不总是明显。对于CON A,每种血细胞类型的平均标记密度在各类血细胞之间存在显著差异。红细胞仅有极少的CON A结合,而单核细胞和血小板群体是血细胞中反应性最强的。在女性和男性受试者的相应细胞种类之间未发现差异。