Göranzon H, Forsum E, Thilén M
Am J Clin Nutr. 1983 Dec;38(6):954-63. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/38.6.954.
Several approaches are currently in use for calculating metabolizable energy of mixed diets from the foods and nutrients they contain. This study compares the metabolizable energy content of six low fiber and one high fiber diet as calculated by conventional procedures (ie, using Atwater's general factors, Merrill and Watts specific factors, and the British procedure where the monosaccharide equivalent of available carbohydrates is multiplied by 3.75 kcal/g) with values for metabolizable energy measured in balance experiments on human subjects. For the low fiber diets, the conventional procedures for calculation of metabolizable energy showed an average deviation between calculated and measured values of up to about 6% of the value obtained in balance experiments. For the high fiber diet Merrill and Watts specific factors and Atwater's general factors were superior to the British approach for calculation of metabolizable energy. Fecal energy content in relation to intake of undigestible energy is discussed.
目前有几种方法可用于根据混合日粮所含的食物和营养素来计算其可代谢能量。本研究将按照传统程序(即使用阿特沃特通用系数、梅里尔和瓦茨特定系数,以及将可利用碳水化合物的单糖当量乘以3.75千卡/克的英国程序)计算的六种低纤维日粮和一种高纤维日粮的可代谢能量含量,与在人体受试者平衡实验中测得的可代谢能量值进行了比较。对于低纤维日粮,计算可代谢能量的传统程序显示,计算值与实测值之间的平均偏差高达平衡实验所得值的约6%。对于高纤维日粮,梅里尔和瓦茨特定系数以及阿特沃特通用系数在计算可代谢能量方面优于英国方法。文中还讨论了粪便能量含量与未消化能量摄入量的关系。