[放射变应原吸附试验（RAST）在花粉症诊断中的价值]
[The value of the radio-allergo-sorbent test (RAST) in the diagnosis of pollinosis].
作者信息
Kersten W, Hoek G T
出版信息
Fortschr Med. 1978 Mar 23;96(11):597-9.
PMID:631700
Abstract
Conclusions for pollinosis: 1. RAST is not necessary for the diagnosis when history and skin tests are characteristic. 2. If RAST is indicated (e.g. small children, urticaria factitia, eczema) tests with two or three grasses or a grass-mixture are sufficient. 3. RAST classes 1 and 2 have no diagnostic value. 4. If skin tests give no clearcut results provocation tests are preferable to RAST.
摘要
花粉症的结论
- 当病史和皮肤试验具有特征性时，诊断并不需要放射性变应原吸附试验（RAST）。2. 如果需要进行RAST（如小儿、人工荨麻疹、湿疹），检测两三种草或一种草混合制剂就足够了。3. RAST 1级和2级没有诊断价值。4. 如果皮肤试验结果不明确，激发试验比RAST更可取。
Zotero 插件