Suppr超能文献

微小终板电位是由于一个囊泡的释放,还是由于在一个活性区同时释放几个囊泡所致?

Is the MEPP due to the release of one vesicle or to the simultaneous release of several vesicles at one active zone?

作者信息

Tremblay J P, Laurie R E, Colonnier M

出版信息

Brain Res. 1983 Dec;287(3):299-314. doi: 10.1016/0165-0173(83)90009-7.

Abstract

Miniature end-plate potentials (MEPPs) recorded at the neuromuscular junction were initially reported to be normally distributed and have been attributed to quantal ACh release. This quantum was later correlated with the release of the content of one clear vesicle. This is the 'classical vesicular hypothesis'. Recent observations of subminiature end-plate potentials (s-MEPPs) and of multimodal distribution of the MEPP amplitudes have led to the formulation of a new 'multivesicular hypothesis'. It attributes the s-MEPP to the release of one vesicle and the MEPP to the simultaneous release of several vesicles at one active zone. The distribution of MEPP intervals, the evaluation of the ACh content of a vesicle and of the ACh necessary to produce a MEPP, estimates of the number of vesicles missing following repeated stimulation, and the freeze fracture studies of the active zone do not permit a definitive rejection of either hypotheses.

摘要

最初报道称,在神经肌肉接头处记录到的微小终板电位(MEPPs)呈正态分布,并被归因于量子化的乙酰胆碱(ACh)释放。后来,这个量子与一个清亮囊泡内容物的释放相关联。这就是“经典囊泡假说”。最近对超微小终板电位(s-MEPPs)以及MEPP振幅的多峰分布的观察,导致了一种新的“多囊泡假说”的形成。该假说将s-MEPP归因于一个囊泡的释放,而将MEPP归因于在一个活动区同时释放几个囊泡。MEPP间隔的分布、对一个囊泡的ACh含量以及产生一个MEPP所需的ACh的评估、对重复刺激后缺失囊泡数量的估计,以及对活动区的冷冻蚀刻研究,都无法明确否定这两种假说中的任何一种。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验