Shadomy S, Espinel-Ingroff A, Kerkering T M
Sabouraudia. 1984;22(1):7-15. doi: 10.1080/00362178485380041.
Four new antifungal agents were compared in vitro with miconazole and ketoconazole. The agents were BAY n 7133 and ICI 153,066, two orally active triazoles, and bifonazole (BAY h 4502) and Ro 14-4767/002, both topical agents. While all four were found to be broad spectrum antifungal agents they also demonstrated certain gaps in their spectra. In general, Ro 14-4767/002 was the most active agent tested whereas bifonazole and BAY n 7133 were the least active. Noteworthy activities included that of Ro 14-4767/002 against Candida albicans, the dermatophytes and Sporothrix schenckii and that of ICI 153,066 against Torulopsis glabrata.
将四种新型抗真菌剂在体外与咪康唑和酮康唑进行了比较。这些药剂分别是BAY n 7133和ICI 153,066,两种口服活性三唑类药物,以及联苯苄唑(BAY h 4502)和Ro 14-4767/002,均为外用药物。虽然发现这四种都是广谱抗真菌剂,但它们在抗菌谱方面也显示出某些差距。总体而言,Ro 14-4767/002是测试中活性最高的药剂,而联苯苄唑和BAY n 7133活性最低。值得注意的活性包括Ro 14-4767/002对白色念珠菌、皮肤癣菌和申克孢子丝菌的活性,以及ICI 153,066对光滑球拟酵母菌的活性。