Maroudas N G
J Theor Biol. 1984 Mar 21;107(2):243-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(84)80025-9.
An entropic mechanism, previously worked out to explain the low adhesiveness of fluid phospholipid, also seems to explain some effects of membrane fluidity on the "embedding" of receptor proteins. Water, at the phospholipid interface, has to compete with protein for the available area but is impeded in its Brownian motion by hydrogen bonding to the slow-moving phosphatide. Hence, any increase in phosphatide mobility (e.g. by lipid melting) is entropically favourable to water, which spreads by displacing receptor particles from the interface into the hydrocarbon phase. This reconciles the kinetic viewpoint of Shintzky (experimental correlation of submergence with microviscosity) with the thermodynamic theory of Gerson (submergence increases with phospholipid hydrophilicity). Because Brownian motion increases water entropy, it follows that a more fluid interface must have a more negative free energy i.e. become more hydrophilic.
一种先前已被阐述以解释流体磷脂低粘附性的熵机制,似乎也能解释膜流动性对受体蛋白“嵌入”的一些影响。在磷脂界面处,水必须与蛋白质竞争可用面积,但由于与缓慢移动的磷脂形成氢键,其布朗运动受到阻碍。因此,磷脂流动性的任何增加(例如通过脂质熔化)在熵上对水是有利的,水通过将受体颗粒从界面置换到烃相而扩散。这使辛茨基的动力学观点(淹没与微粘度的实验相关性)与格森的热力学理论(淹没随磷脂亲水性增加)相一致。因为布朗运动增加了水的熵,所以更具流动性的界面必然具有更负的自由能,即变得更亲水。