Hoffer P B, Neumann R, Quartararo L, Lange R, Hernandez T
J Nucl Med. 1984 Feb;25(2):230-6.
The purpose of this study was to determine what effect further improvement in an Anger camera's intrinsic resolution has on lesion detection. We studied 52 patients undergoing bone imaging and 58 undergoing liver imaging. All patients had images performed in rapid sequence on ZLC -75 and ZLC -37 Anger cameras, both by Siemens. The two imaging systems are virtually identical except for the number of photomultiplier tubes and crystal thickness; these resulted in differences in intrinsic resolution ( ZLC -75 less than 3.8 mm FWHM at 140 keV, ZLC -37 less than 4.9 mm) and sensitivity ( ZLC -75 approximately 0.91 of ZLC -37 at 140 keV). Observer performance, measured by ROC curves, for detection of abnormalities was virtually identical with the two instruments. Subjectively, there was a trend toward preference of the ZLC -75 images, but this was not associated with any significant improvement in lesion detectability even in the subgroup in which a preference for one or the other instrument was noted.
本研究的目的是确定Anger相机固有分辨率的进一步提高对病变检测有何影响。我们研究了52例接受骨显像的患者和58例接受肝脏显像的患者。所有患者均通过西门子的ZLC -75和ZLC -37 Anger相机快速序列采集图像。这两种成像系统除光电倍增管数量和晶体厚度外几乎完全相同;这些因素导致了固有分辨率(ZLC -75在140 keV时半高宽小于3.8 mm,ZLC -37小于4.9 mm)和灵敏度(ZLC -75在140 keV时约为ZLC -37的0.91)的差异。通过ROC曲线测量的观察者对异常检测的表现,在这两种仪器上几乎相同。主观上,存在对ZLC -75图像更偏好的趋势,但即使在注意到对其中一种仪器有偏好的亚组中,这也与病变可检测性的任何显著改善无关。