Smith E B, Bowser-Riley F, Daniels S, Dunbar I T, Harrison C B, Paton W D
Nature. 1984;311(5981):56-7. doi: 10.1038/311056a0.
The mechanism of general anaesthesia has proved difficult to elucidate (see ref. 1 for a review), although the relative potencies of anaesthetic agents have been used to establish that the site at which anaesthetics act is hydrophobic in nature. One further clue to their mode of action is that the effects of anaesthetics on vertebrates can be eliminated by pressures of approximately 100 atm (refs 3, 4). However, the effects of anaesthetics are not always reversed in model systems, where there is evidence that the pattern of pressure reversal varies significantly. We now find that pressure fails to reverse the effects of anaesthetics on the freshwater shrimp (Gammarus pulex), although the sensitivity of these crustaceans to anaesthetics is comparable with that of higher animals. This is hard to reconcile with traditional bio-physical mechanisms and indicates that anaesthetics may act at a specific protein site rather than having a general effect on cell membranes. The pharmacology of pressure in mammals seems to be more similar to that of strychnine than of any other central stimulant. As glycine, whose action is blocked by strychnine, is absent as a neurotransmitter in the arthropod central nervous system, we believe that this substance may be involved in determining pressure-anaesthetic interactions in vertebrates.
尽管麻醉剂的相对效力已被用于确定麻醉剂作用的部位本质上是疏水的,但全身麻醉的机制已被证明难以阐明(综述见参考文献1)。关于其作用方式的另一条线索是,大约100个大气压的压力可以消除麻醉剂对脊椎动物的影响(参考文献3、4)。然而,在模型系统中,麻醉剂的作用并不总是能被逆转,有证据表明压力逆转的模式有显著差异。我们现在发现,压力无法逆转麻醉剂对淡水虾(蚤状钩虾)的影响,尽管这些甲壳类动物对麻醉剂的敏感性与高等动物相当。这很难与传统的生物物理机制相协调,表明麻醉剂可能作用于特定的蛋白质位点,而不是对细胞膜产生普遍影响。哺乳动物中压力的药理学似乎与士的宁的药理学比与任何其他中枢兴奋剂的药理学更相似。由于士的宁会阻断其作用的甘氨酸在节肢动物中枢神经系统中作为神经递质不存在,我们认为这种物质可能参与确定脊椎动物中压力与麻醉剂的相互作用。