Suppr超能文献

高压下吸入麻醉剂与静脉麻醉剂的混合物。全身麻醉多部位假说的一项测试。

Mixtures of inhalation and i.v. anaesthetics at high pressure. A test of the multi-site hypothesis of general anaesthesia.

作者信息

Wardley-Smith B, Halsey M J

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1985 Dec;57(12):1248-56. doi: 10.1093/bja/57.12.1248.

Abstract

We have tested the hypothesis that anaesthetics having different pressure reversal characteristics act at different molecular sites with finite capacities and, therefore, do not necessarily have additive potencies when used in mixtures of varying composition. The additivity of the anaesthetic potencies has been tested at normal pressures and at pressures up to 100 ATA for eight combinations of the following mixtures: Althesin plus nitrous oxide; methohexitone plus nitrous oxide; thiopentone plus nitrous oxide; thiopentone plus propanidid. The anaesthetic potencies of the first two mixtures were not additive at increased pressures, whereas those of the latter two mixtures were additive. These data support the multi-site hypothesis of general anaesthesia.

摘要

我们已经验证了这样一个假设

具有不同压力反转特性的麻醉剂作用于不同的分子位点,且这些位点具有有限的容量,因此,当用于不同组成的混合物中时,它们的效力不一定具有相加性。在常压和高达100个绝对大气压的压力下,对以下混合物的八种组合进行了麻醉效力相加性测试:安泰酮加氧化亚氮;美索比妥加氧化亚氮;硫喷妥钠加氧化亚氮;硫喷妥钠加丙泮尼地。前两种混合物在压力升高时麻醉效力不具有相加性,而后两种混合物的麻醉效力具有相加性。这些数据支持全身麻醉的多位点假说。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验