Weigent D A, Lloyd R E, Blalock J E, Stanton G J
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1984 Nov;177(2):257-61. doi: 10.3181/00379727-177-41940.
Human T cells treated with low levels of interferon (IFN) (1-10 units/ml), and washed to remove the IFN, transferred the same level of antiviral activity to recipient WISH cells as an equivalent IFN treatment alone could induce in WISH cells. Further, when T cells pretreated with IFN (1-10 units/ml) were cocultivated with WISH cells in the presence of IFN (1-10 units/ml), a 2.5- to 5-fold greater level of protection developed than could be expected from the additive effect of each. Antibody to leukocyte, fibroblast, or immune IFN blocked the antiviral effect of the respective IFN types but had no effect on the transfer of antiviral activity initiated by leukocyte, fibroblast, or immune IFN. Also, treatment of T cells with actinomycin D blocked the transfer of antiviral activity of IFN-treated T cells. Taken together, the data suggest that the increased antiviral activity is not merely an additive effect of the IFN, but represents a synergistic amplification of protection most likely due to the combination of the separate effects of IFN and IFN-induced transfer. Such interactions would be expected to play a major role in early protection against virus infections in vivo when low levels of interferon are present and lymphocytes are migrating into the area.
用低水平干扰素(IFN)(1 - 10单位/毫升)处理人T细胞,然后洗涤以去除IFN,这些T细胞向受体WISH细胞转移的抗病毒活性水平,与单独用等量IFN处理WISH细胞所诱导的抗病毒活性水平相同。此外,当用IFN(1 - 10单位/毫升)预处理的T细胞在IFN(1 - 10单位/毫升)存在的情况下与WISH细胞共培养时,所产生的保护水平比预期的两者相加效应高2.5至5倍。针对白细胞、成纤维细胞或免疫IFN的抗体可阻断相应类型IFN的抗病毒作用,但对由白细胞IFN、成纤维细胞IFN或免疫IFN引发的抗病毒活性转移没有影响。同样,用放线菌素D处理T细胞可阻断经IFN处理的T细胞的抗病毒活性转移。综上所述,数据表明抗病毒活性的增加不仅仅是IFN的相加效应,而是最有可能由于IFN及其诱导转移的单独效应的组合而导致的保护作用的协同放大。当体内存在低水平干扰素且淋巴细胞迁移到该区域时,预计这种相互作用在早期抵抗病毒感染中起主要作用。