Anderson J R, Wilson J F, Jenkin D T, Meadows A T, Kersey J, Chilcote R R, Coccia P, Exelby P, Kushner J, Siegel S, Hammond D
N Engl J Med. 1983 Mar 10;308(10):559-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198303103081003.
Members of the Childrens Cancer Study Group treated 234 eligible patients in a randomized trial designed to study the relative effectiveness of two therapy programs for the treatment of childhood and adolescent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Two chemotherapeutic strategies were compared: a 4-drug regimen (COMP) and a 10-drug regimen (modified LSA2-L2). Failure-free survival for all patients was 60 per cent at 24 months. In patients with disseminated disease treatment success was influenced by both the histologic subtype of disease and the therapeutic regimen followed. The 10-drug program was more effective than the 4-drug program in patients with disseminated lymphoblastic disease (two-year failure-free survival rate, 76 vs. 26 per cent, respectively; P = 0.0002), whereas the 4-drug program was more effective than the 10-drug program in those with nonlymphoblastic disease (57 vs. 28 per cent, respectively, P = 0.008). The less toxic, more easily administered 4-drug regimen was as effective as the 10-drug regimen in patients with localized disease (89 vs. 84 per cent, respectively).
儿童癌症研究组的成员对234名符合条件的患者进行了一项随机试验,该试验旨在研究两种治疗方案对儿童和青少年非霍奇金淋巴瘤的相对疗效。比较了两种化疗策略:一种是四联疗法(COMP),另一种是十联疗法(改良LSA2-L2)。所有患者24个月时的无失败生存率为60%。在患有播散性疾病的患者中,治疗成功受疾病的组织学亚型和所采用的治疗方案的影响。在患有播散性淋巴细胞性疾病的患者中,十联疗法比四联疗法更有效(两年无失败生存率分别为76%和26%;P = 0.0002),而在患有非淋巴细胞性疾病的患者中,四联疗法比十联疗法更有效(分别为57%和28%,P = 0.008)。在患有局限性疾病的患者中,毒性较小、更易于实施的四联疗法与十联疗法效果相同(分别为89%和84%)。