Babich H, Stotzky G
Environ Health Perspect. 1983 Mar;49:247-60. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8349247.
This article suggests and discusses two novel aspects for the formulation of standards for environmental toxicants. First, uniform national standards for each pollutant will be underprotective for some ecosystems and overprotective for others, inasmuch as the toxicity of a pollutant to the indigenous biota is dependent on the physicochemical properties of the recipient environment. As the number of chemicals that need regulation is immense and as microbes appear to respond similarly to pollutant-abiotic factor interactions as do plants and animals, it is suggested that microbial assays be used initially to identify those abiotic factors that most influence the toxicity of specific pollutants. Thereafter, additional studies using plants and animals can focus on these pollutant-abiotic factor interactions, and more meaningful standards can then be formulated more rapidly and inexpensively. Second, it is suggested that the response to pollutants of microbe-mediated ecologic processes be used to quantitate the sensitivity of different ecosystems to various toxicants. Such a quantification, expressed in terms of an "ecological dose 50%" (EcD50), could be easily incorporated into the methodologies currently used to set water quality criteria and would also be applicable to setting criteria for terrestrial ecosystems.
本文提出并讨论了制定环境毒物标准的两个新方面。首先,每种污染物的统一国家标准对某些生态系统保护不足,而对其他生态系统则保护过度,因为污染物对本地生物群的毒性取决于受体环境的物理化学性质。由于需要监管的化学品数量巨大,而且微生物对污染物与非生物因子相互作用的反应似乎与植物和动物相似,因此建议首先使用微生物检测来确定那些对特定污染物毒性影响最大的非生物因子。此后,使用植物和动物进行的其他研究可以专注于这些污染物与非生物因子的相互作用,从而可以更快、更廉价地制定出更有意义的标准。其次,建议利用微生物介导的生态过程对污染物的反应来量化不同生态系统对各种毒物的敏感性。这种以“生态半数效应剂量”(EcD50)表示的量化方法可以很容易地纳入目前用于设定水质标准的方法中,也适用于设定陆地生态系统的标准。