Altshuler C H
Clin Lab Med. 1983 Mar;3(1):179-204.
Our experience suggests that (1) comprehensive objective information is a valuable medical resource; (2) the systematic acquisition of objective information in a form suitable for computers is a necessary first step to building a useful data base; (3) when appropriately utilized, objective medical information may permit a study of medical practice, cost of care, and operational efficiency; (4) analysis of costs divorced from outcome and rehospitalization experiences may be misleading; (5) for some desired studies, the information required may be obtainable within a single institution. For others, however, community-wide studies may be the only possible way to obtain the information needed; (6) useful computer systems will be developed only if the health professionals become more knowledgeable (and demanding) and administrators are persuaded to provide effective support; and (7) effective hospital support for adequate medical information systems will probably come when criteria evaluating hospital performance are altered to reflect society's needs. Our experience with computer evaluation of care has been a sobering one. Still, it is obvious that the technology offers considerable hope that many inefficiencies in practice can be corrected. Considering all the current jeremiads about what we can afford in health care, it is reassuring to learn that good medicine is cost effective.
(1)全面的客观信息是一种宝贵的医学资源;(2)以适合计算机处理的形式系统地获取客观信息是建立有用数据库的必要第一步;(3)如果使用得当,客观医学信息可用于研究医疗实践、护理成本和运营效率;(4)脱离结果和再住院经历来分析成本可能会产生误导;(5)对于某些所需的研究,所需信息可能可在单个机构内获取。然而,对于其他研究而言,全社区范围的研究可能是获取所需信息的唯一可行途径;(6)只有当卫生专业人员知识更丰富(且要求更高),并且管理人员被说服提供有效支持时,才会开发出有用的计算机系统;(7)当评估医院绩效的标准改变以反映社会需求时,医院可能才会为充分的医学信息系统提供有效的支持。我们对医疗护理进行计算机评估的经验令人警醒。不过,很明显,这项技术带来了很大的希望,即许多实践中的低效率情况能够得到纠正。鉴于当前关于我们在医疗保健方面能够承担何种费用的种种悲观论调,得知优质医疗具有成本效益,倒是让人感到欣慰。