Gärtner R, Horn K, König A, Schatz H
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1983 Jun;21(6):373-9. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1983.21.6.373.
Fourteen laboratories participated in an external quality control survey (EQCS) for antithyroglobulin- and antimicrosomal-antibody determination. Seventeen frozen serum samples from individuals suffering from various thyroid diseases were dispatched by mail. Different test systems were used by the participants including the haemagglutinatin test, radioimmunoassay (RIA), enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) and immunofluorescence test. The different test results of each participant were sized and could be compared by giving place numbers to each test result. Inter-laboratory quality control was performed by evaluation of a rank correlation coefficient. There was close agreement between the haemagglutination test results of antimicrosomal antibody determination with different test kits, and these tests showed good precision. Antithyroglobulin antibody titers from the two haemagglutination test-kits used, however, were not directly comparable. When sized by place numbers, antithyroglobulin antibody results from haemagglutinatin test, RIA and ELISA were in close agreement. The least correspondence was shown by the immunofluorescence test, in the antithyroglobulin antibody determination.
14个实验室参与了一项抗甲状腺球蛋白和抗微粒体抗体测定的外部质量控制调查(EQCS)。通过邮件发送了17份来自患有各种甲状腺疾病个体的冷冻血清样本。参与者使用了不同的检测系统,包括血凝试验、放射免疫测定(RIA)、酶免疫测定(ELISA)和免疫荧光试验。通过给每个检测结果赋予位置编号,对每个参与者的不同检测结果进行了排序并可进行比较。通过评估等级相关系数进行实验室间质量控制。不同试剂盒的抗微粒体抗体测定血凝试验结果之间有密切一致性,且这些试验显示出良好的精密度。然而,所使用的两种血凝试验试剂盒的抗甲状腺球蛋白抗体效价不能直接比较。按位置编号排序时,血凝试验、RIA和ELISA的抗甲状腺球蛋白抗体结果密切一致。在抗甲状腺球蛋白抗体测定中,免疫荧光试验显示的一致性最差。