Morrow G R, Labrum A
Psychol Med. 1978 Feb;8(1):95-101. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700006668.
The responses of 6 representative physiological parameters frequently assumed to be measures of anxiety along with a set of 4 psychological tests for measuring anxiety were obtained under naturalistic conditions from 25 patients hospitalized with a first myocardial infarction. A canonical correlational analysis failed to show any relationship between anxiety as assessed by the Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale, Mood Adjective Check List, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Multiple Affect Adjective Check List psychological tests, and anxiety as assessed by the physiological indices of heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, epinephrine, norepinephrine and VMA. The intercorrelation matrix revealed a significant positive pattern of relationships among all 4 psychological tests, a non-significant, positive pattern of relationships among the physiological indices, and a non-significant, negative pattern of relationships between the psychological and physiological measures. The absence of mood-specific physiological measures for anxiety, as measured by the psychological tests, supports previous theory and investigation and points to the inadvisability of assuming that studies on anxiety that use diverse physiological and psychological measures yield results that may be compared as though they were assessing a common mood.
在自然条件下,从25名首次因心肌梗死住院的患者身上获取了6种常被视为焦虑指标的代表性生理参数的反应,以及一套4种用于测量焦虑的心理测试结果。典型相关分析未能显示出通过泰勒显性焦虑量表、情绪形容词检查表、状态-特质焦虑量表和多重情感形容词检查表心理测试所评估的焦虑,与通过心率、收缩压和舒张压、肾上腺素、去甲肾上腺素和香草扁桃酸的生理指标所评估的焦虑之间存在任何关系。相互关联矩阵显示,所有4种心理测试之间存在显著的正相关关系模式,生理指标之间存在不显著的正相关关系模式,心理和生理测量之间存在不显著的负相关关系模式。通过心理测试测量的焦虑缺乏特定情绪的生理指标,这支持了先前的理论和研究,并表明假设使用不同生理和心理测量方法进行的焦虑研究能产生可被视为在评估共同情绪的可比结果是不可取的。