Brinkman S D, Gershon S
Neurobiol Aging. 1983 Summer;4(2):139-45. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(83)90038-6.
Double-blind, placebo-controlled investigations of scopolamine, physostigmine, arecoline, and tetrahydroaminoacridine (THA) in normal adults and in dementia of the Alzheimer-type (DAT) were reviewed to determine the relative sensitivity of various assessment procedures in the measurement of drug effects. In normal adults, word list learning techniques have been most widely employed and have been sensitive to drug effects. In DAT, a wide variety of assessment procedures have been employed. Based on the limited number of possible comparisons across studies, two procedures appear to be useful: word list learning tasks that generate an index of intrusion errors, and visual recognition tasks. The lack of standardized assessments limits the ability of investigators to replicate studies, to compare relative efficacy of various drugs, or to address a number of other questions that are fundamental to the development of effective cholinergic treatments for DAT.
对东莨菪碱、毒扁豆碱、槟榔碱和四氢氨基吖啶(THA)在正常成年人及阿尔茨海默型痴呆(DAT)患者中进行的双盲、安慰剂对照研究进行了综述,以确定各种评估程序在测量药物效应时的相对敏感性。在正常成年人中,单词表学习技术应用最为广泛,且对药物效应敏感。在DAT患者中,采用了多种评估程序。基于各研究间有限的可能比较,有两种程序似乎有用:生成侵入性错误指数的单词表学习任务和视觉识别任务。缺乏标准化评估限制了研究人员重复研究、比较各种药物相对疗效或解决许多其他对于开发有效的DAT胆碱能治疗至关重要问题的能力。