Koelbing H M
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1983 Oct 1;113(39):1378-84.
If we are to help patients effectively, our understanding of diseases and our therapeutic potential should, again and again, just be somewhat better than they actually are. Throughout the ages this has been the fundamental situation in medical practice. The response on the physician's part has nearly always been an attitude of therapeutic optimism. At all times physicians--and patients also--have relied on therapeutic principles and remedies based on professional experience and medical theory. In conjunction with the (generally recognized) healing powers of nature, and of (unrecognized) autosuggestion, this has led to many satisfactory and even remarkable cures. Examples from antiquity to the 19th century are quoted, and the snags of an over-optimistic attitude become evident, viz. a rational therapy is no better than the underlying pathogenetic theory; exaggerated therapeutic activity may cause useless torment to the patient (a point already made by Hippocrates); the optimistic physician or the enthusiastic pioneer of a new remedy may be blind to toxic side effects or the development of addiction. To sum up: therapeutic optimism is fine--but don't overdo it!
如果我们要有效地帮助患者,我们对疾病的理解以及我们的治疗潜力应该一次又一次地略优于实际情况。古往今来,这一直是医疗实践中的基本状况。医生的反应几乎总是一种治疗乐观主义的态度。各个时代的医生——患者也是如此——一直依赖基于专业经验和医学理论的治疗原则和疗法。结合(普遍认可的)自然治愈力以及(未被认识到的)自我暗示,这带来了许多令人满意甚至显著的治愈案例。文中引用了从古至今直至19世纪的例子,过度乐观态度的问题变得明显,即合理的治疗并不比潜在的发病理论更好;过度的治疗活动可能给患者带来无用的痛苦(希波克拉底早已指出这一点);乐观的医生或新疗法的热情倡导者可能对毒副作用或成瘾的发展视而不见。总之:治疗乐观主义是好事——但别过头!