• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

百日咳疫苗接种:自1981年卫生与社会保障部报告以来的争议综述。

Whooping cough vaccination: a review of the controversy since the 1981 DHSS report.

作者信息

Harding C M

出版信息

Child Care Health Dev. 1983 Sep-Oct;9(5):257-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1983.tb00324.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2214.1983.tb00324.x
PMID:6357527
Abstract

This article reviews the literature on the whooping cough controversy subsequent to the publication of the DHSS report in 1981. The report's reception is outlined and its influence on specific, topical issues such as contraindications, vaccine efficacy, and the calculation of 'risk' statistics is considered. The seriousness of the disease, the age of its victims and its treatment by antibiotics are also discussed with specific reference to recent epidemics. The implications of recent research findings for the continuation of the immunization programme are presented. It is concluded that the controversy continues.

摘要

本文回顾了1981年卫生与社会保障部(DHSS)报告发表之后关于百日咳争议的文献。概述了该报告的反响,并考量了其对诸如禁忌症、疫苗效力以及“风险”统计计算等特定热门问题的影响。还结合近期的疫情,讨论了该疾病的严重性、受害者年龄及其抗生素治疗方法。介绍了近期研究结果对继续实施免疫计划的影响。得出的结论是争议仍在继续。

相似文献

1
Whooping cough vaccination: a review of the controversy since the 1981 DHSS report.百日咳疫苗接种:自1981年卫生与社会保障部报告以来的争议综述。
Child Care Health Dev. 1983 Sep-Oct;9(5):257-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1983.tb00324.x.
2
Whooping-cough vaccination. Comment on report from Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation.百日咳疫苗接种。对疫苗接种与免疫联合委员会报告的评论
Lancet. 1978 Feb 18;1(8060):370-1. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)91092-9.
3
Whooping cough immunization in France and Britain: discussion paper.法国和英国的百日咳免疫接种:讨论文件
J R Soc Med. 1983 May;76(5):374-8.
4
Whooping-cough vaccination. An assessment.百日咳疫苗接种。一项评估。
Lancet. 1974 Aug 31;2(7879):511-3.
5
[Difficulties in pertussis vaccination].[百日咳疫苗接种的难点]
Monatsschr Kinderheilkd (1902). 1969 Feb;117(2):77-9.
6
Re: "Whooping cough and whooping cough vaccine: the risks and benefits debate".关于:“百日咳与百日咳疫苗:风险与益处之辩论”
Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Jan;119(1):135-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113714.
7
Whooping cough and whooping cough vaccine: the risks and benefits debate.百日咳与百日咳疫苗:风险与益处之辩
Epidemiol Rev. 1982;4:1-24. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036242.
8
Whooping cough and pertussis vaccine: a comparison of risks and benefits in Britain during the period 1968-83.百日咳与百日咳疫苗:1968 - 1983年英国的风险与益处比较
Dev Biol Stand. 1985;61:395-405.
9
The whooping-cough immunisation controversy.百日咳免疫接种争议。
Arch Dis Child. 1981 Aug;56(8):577-80. doi: 10.1136/adc.56.8.577.
10
Whooping cough vaccines: where next?百日咳疫苗:下一步何去何从?
Child Care Health Dev. 1998 Jul;24(4):259-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1998.tb00945.x.