Lemoine P, Pacault-Legendre V
Encephale. 1983;9(2):97-110.
This article presents a comparison of research ethics in psychopharmacology in France and the United States. The authors present some elements of definition, etymology and of history. In addition, they study how this very specific research is actually done. Many questions are discussed, including the right of the patient, and the problem of normal volunteers. Other aspects are more technical i.e. remuneration, protocol, and the product. Finally the role of the ethics committees is investigated. These committees comprise the third component of the trial that consists of the research and the subject.
本文对法国和美国精神药理学领域的研究伦理进行了比较。作者介绍了一些定义、词源和历史方面的内容。此外,他们研究了这种非常特殊的研究实际上是如何开展的。讨论了许多问题,包括患者的权利以及正常志愿者的问题。其他方面则更具技术性,即报酬、方案和产品。最后,对伦理委员会的作用进行了调查。这些委员会构成了试验的第三个组成部分,试验的另外两个组成部分是研究和受试者。