Lantto O, Lindbäck B, Aakvaag A, Damkjaer-Nielsen M, Pomoell U M, Björkhem I
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1983 Sep;43(5):433-7.
A reference method for serum cortisol, based on isotope dilution-mass spectrometry (ID-MS), was compared with a modified commercial RIA method. The modification solely concerned the calibration standards used in the RIA method. These were replaced by a series of human serum samples, in which the concentration of cortisol had been determined by the reference ID-MS method. The samples were selected so as to cover the whole range of the standard curve. Serum samples from healthy, untreated subjects with cortisol concentrations 270-1134 nmol/l were analysed with the ID-MS calibrated RIA method in four laboratories, one in each of the four Nordic countries. The results from two of the four laboratories did not differ significantly from the ID-MS values (P less than 0.05), whereas the results from the other two laboratories differed slightly. The mean values based on results from all four laboratories were almost identical with the values obtained with the reference method. In addition, serum samples from 11 patients with endocrine disorders with cortisol concentrations 31-916 nmol/l were analysed in three of the four laboratories. In three of the samples significant differences were observed between the values obtained with the ID-MS and the ID-MS calibrated RIA method. The value obtained with the ID-MS calibrated RIA was however always more accurate than the corresponding value obtained with RIA with the use of a commercial calibration standard. Advantages of the present model in increasing the accuracy of routine analysis by RIA are discussed. The possibility is further discussed that the ID-MS calibrated RIA method may be used as a 'secondary reference method'.
将一种基于同位素稀释-质谱法(ID-MS)的血清皮质醇参考方法与一种改良的商业放射免疫分析法(RIA)进行了比较。该改良仅涉及RIA方法中使用的校准标准品。这些校准标准品被一系列人血清样本所取代,这些样本中皮质醇的浓度已通过参考ID-MS方法测定。所选取的样本覆盖了标准曲线的整个范围。来自四个北欧国家各一个实验室的四个实验室,使用经ID-MS校准的RIA方法对270 - 1134 nmol/l的皮质醇浓度的健康未治疗受试者的血清样本进行了分析。四个实验室中的两个实验室的结果与ID-MS值无显著差异(P小于0.05),而另外两个实验室的结果略有不同。基于所有四个实验室结果的平均值与参考方法获得的值几乎相同。此外,四个实验室中的三个实验室对11例内分泌疾病患者皮质醇浓度为31 - 916 nmol/l的血清样本进行了分析。在三个样本中,观察到ID-MS法和经ID-MS校准的RIA法所获值之间存在显著差异。然而,使用经ID-MS校准的RIA所获得的值总是比使用商业校准标准品的RIA所获得的相应值更准确。讨论了本模型在提高RIA常规分析准确性方面的优势。进一步讨论了经ID-MS校准的RIA方法用作 “二级参考方法” 的可能性。