Banta H D
Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(18):1363-9. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(83)90196-x.
Policies could be better devised and better implemented if greater use were made of the social sciences. However, the social sciences have quite often not produced knowledge adequate to permit resolution of pressing social problems. An example of both of these statements is found in the area of policies toward medical technology. Medical technology has become a major public policy issue in most industrialized countries, primarily science research has led to general formulations as to how medical technology is developed and diffused. In addition, specific studies of medical technology have identified factors that impede of facilitate the development and diffusion of medical technology. However, few studies have been done of public policy mechanisms. Effects of formal policies have not been evaluated, and organizations developed to implement policies toward medical technologies have not been studied. Programs cannot be improved without evaluation, nor can successful approaches be diffused more widely. The development and implementation of public policy toward medical technology would profit if social scientists were to become involved in its examination.
如果能更多地运用社会科学,政策就能得到更好的制定和实施。然而,社会科学常常未能产生足够的知识,以解决紧迫的社会问题。这两种情况在医疗技术政策领域都有体现。在大多数工业化国家,医疗技术已成为一个重大的公共政策问题,主要是因为科学研究已得出关于医疗技术如何发展和传播的一般表述。此外,对医疗技术的具体研究已经确定了阻碍或促进医疗技术发展和传播的因素。然而,针对公共政策机制的研究却很少。正式政策的效果尚未得到评估,为实施医疗技术政策而设立的组织也未得到研究。没有评估,项目就无法改进,成功的方法也无法更广泛地传播。如果社会科学家参与对医疗技术公共政策的审查,那么其制定和实施将会从中受益。