Seawright G L, Despommier D, Zimmermann W, Isenstein R S
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1983 Nov;32(6):1275-84. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1983.32.1275.
Various preparations of crude and a purified preparation of Trichinella spiralis antigens were compared in a rapid, micro-enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detecting trichinellosis in swine. The crude antigen preparations (XM-300 or S3 fraction) were lipid-free, cell-free fractions of muscle larvae, and the purified antigen was prepared by immunoaffinity chromatography of the soluble fraction of stichocyte secretory granules from rat muscle larvae. The antigens were tested against normal and immune swine sera for sensitivity and specificity, and for their ability to detect seroconversions early in the immune response. At optimum concentrations, absorbance values from immune and nonimmune sera produced sample to noise (S/N) ratios three-fold higher for the column antigen than for XM-300. Tests of sequential sera from experimentally-infected pigs showed that the column antigen produced lower absorbances with pre-infection sera and, from 18 days post-infection, higher absorbances with positive sera. From 21-28 days post-infection, absorbances and S/N ratios with column antigen were nearly twice those with XM-300. Column antigen detected antibodies more often than XM-300 antigen in sera collected prior to the appearance of larvae. Crude antigen did not distinguish all true negatives from weakly positives in a study involving 100 sera from muscle digestion-negative pigs and 75 sera from experimentally infected pigs, whereas the column antigen distinguished all negatives from positives. In a larger scale test of the column antigen, 1,130 pigs from Puerto Rico were tested in the micro-EIA test. Puerto Rico has no endogenous trichinellosis, and all 1,130 pigs were shown to be muscle digestion negative. These same pigs were all negative using the column antigen. These results show that the column antigen out-performs the crude antigens in sensitivity, specificity, and early detection. The column antigen is therefore a major improvement in the EIA for swine trichinellosis.
在一项用于检测猪旋毛虫病的快速微量酶免疫测定(EIA)中,对旋毛虫抗原的各种粗制制剂和一种纯化制剂进行了比较。粗制抗原制剂(XM - 300或S3组分)是无脂质、无细胞的肌幼虫组分,而纯化抗原是通过对大鼠肌幼虫刺细胞分泌颗粒的可溶组分进行免疫亲和层析制备的。针对正常猪和免疫猪血清测试了这些抗原的敏感性、特异性以及在免疫反应早期检测血清转化的能力。在最佳浓度下,免疫血清和非免疫血清的吸光度值产生的柱抗原样本与噪声(S/N)比是XM - 300的三倍。对实验感染猪的连续血清检测表明,柱抗原在感染前血清中产生的吸光度较低,而在感染后18天起,在阳性血清中产生的吸光度较高。在感染后21 - 28天,柱抗原的吸光度和S/N比几乎是XM - 300的两倍。在幼虫出现之前采集的血清中,柱抗原比XM - 300抗原更常检测到抗体。在一项涉及100份来自肌肉消化阴性猪的血清和75份来自实验感染猪的血清的研究中,粗制抗原无法区分所有真阴性和弱阳性,而柱抗原能区分所有阴性和阳性。在对柱抗原的更大规模测试中,对来自波多黎各的1130头猪进行了微量EIA检测。波多黎各没有本地旋毛虫病,所有1130头猪的肌肉消化检测均为阴性。使用柱抗原检测这些猪也均为阴性。这些结果表明,柱抗原在敏感性、特异性和早期检测方面优于粗制抗原。因此,柱抗原是猪旋毛虫病EIA检测的一项重大改进。