Suppr超能文献

犬小肠吻合术的评估:压榨缝合与非压榨缝合技术

Evaluation of anastomoses of small intestine in dogs: crushing versus noncrushing suturing techniques.

作者信息

Bone D L, Duckett K E, Patton C S, Krahwinkel D J

出版信息

Am J Vet Res. 1983 Nov;44(11):2043-8.

PMID:6359979
Abstract

Fifteen dogs were used to compare simple interrupted crushing and noncrushing single-layer small intestinal anastomoses. Groups of 5 dogs each were used to evaluate both techniques at 3 postsurgical times--days 4, 21, and 42. There were no significant differences between the 2 techniques at the evaluations. Grossly, there were marked adhesion formations at the 3 evaluation times. Luminal diameters at the anastomotic site indicated there may have been only slightly more stenosis with the noncrushing technique. Bursting pressure studies determined that the anastomotic strengths of the 2 techniques were not measurably different statistically. However, their bursting strengths had greatly increased from day 4 to day 21. There were also significant increases in bursting strengths of jejunal segments caudal to the anastomotic sites from day 4 to day 42. Subjective histopathologic evaluations of anastomotic sites revealed that the types and amounts of inflammation, collagen content, continuity of layers, and severity of peritonitis were not different within each time. It was concluded that both techniques for small intestinal anastomoses in the dog have equal value.

摘要

使用15只狗来比较单纯间断挤压式和非挤压式单层小肠吻合术。每组5只狗,分别在术后第4天、21天和42天这3个时间点对两种技术进行评估。在评估中,两种技术之间没有显著差异。大体观察,在这3个评估时间点均有明显的粘连形成。吻合部位的管腔直径表明,非挤压技术可能仅存在稍多一点的狭窄。破裂压力研究确定,两种技术的吻合强度在统计学上没有可测量的差异。然而,从第4天到第21天,它们的破裂强度大幅增加。从第4天到第42天,吻合部位尾侧空肠段的破裂强度也有显著增加。对吻合部位的主观组织病理学评估显示,每次评估时炎症的类型和程度、胶原蛋白含量、各层的连续性以及腹膜炎的严重程度均无差异。得出的结论是,狗小肠吻合术的这两种技术具有同等价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验