Brensike J F, Levy R I, Kelsey S F, Passamani E R, Richardson J M, Loh I K, Stone N J, Aldrich R F, Battaglini J W, Moriarty D J
Circulation. 1984 Feb;69(2):313-24. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.69.2.313.
In the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Type II Coronary Intervention Study, patients with Type II hyperlipoproteinemia and coronary artery disease (CAD) were placed on a low-fat, low-cholesterol diet and then were randomly allocated to receive either 6 g cholestyramine four times daily or placebo. This double-blind study evaluated the effects of cholestyramine on the progression of CAD as assessed by angiography. Diet alone reduced the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 6% in both groups. After randomization, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased another 5% in the placebo group and 26% in the cholestyramine-treated group. Coronary angiography was performed in 116 patients before and after 5 years of treatment. CAD progressed in 49% (28 of 57) of the placebo-treated patients vs 32% (19 of 59) of the cholestyramine-treated patients (p less than .05). When only definite progression was considered, 35% (20 of 57) of the placebo-treated patients vs 25% (15 of 59) of the cholestyramine-treated patients exhibited definite progression; the difference was not statistically significant. However, when this analysis was performed with adjustment for baseline inequalities of risk factors, effect of treatment was more pronounced. Of lesions causing 50% or greater stenosis at baseline, 33% of placebo-treated and 12% of cholestyramine-treated patients manifested lesion progression (p less than .05). Similar analyses with other end points (percent of baseline lesions that progressed, lesions that progressed to occlusion, lesions that regressed, size of lesion change, and all cardiovascular end points) all favored the cholestyramine-treated group, but were not statistically significant. Thus, although the sample size does not allow a definitive conclusion to be drawn, this study suggests that cholestyramine treatment retards the rate of progression of CAD in patients with Type II hyperlipoproteinemia.
在国立心肺血液研究所的II型冠状动脉干预研究中,患有II型高脂蛋白血症和冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患者先接受低脂、低胆固醇饮食,然后被随机分配,分别每日4次服用6克考来烯胺或服用安慰剂。这项双盲研究通过血管造影评估了考来烯胺对CAD进展的影响。仅饮食干预使两组的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇均降低了6%。随机分组后,安慰剂组的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇又降低了5%,考来烯胺治疗组则降低了26%。116例患者在治疗5年前后进行了冠状动脉造影。安慰剂治疗的患者中有49%(57例中的28例)CAD病情进展,而考来烯胺治疗的患者中这一比例为32%(59例中的19例)(p<0.05)。仅考虑明确进展时,安慰剂治疗的患者中有35%(57例中的20例)出现明确进展,考来烯胺治疗的患者中这一比例为25%(59例中的15例);差异无统计学意义。然而,在对危险因素的基线不平等进行校正后进行该分析时,治疗效果更为显著。对于基线时造成50%或更大狭窄的病变,安慰剂治疗的患者中有33%出现病变进展,考来烯胺治疗的患者中这一比例为12%(p<0.05)。对其他终点(进展的基线病变百分比、进展至闭塞的病变情况、病变消退情况、病变变化大小以及所有心血管终点)进行的类似分析均有利于考来烯胺治疗组,但无统计学意义。因此,尽管样本量不足以得出确定性结论,但这项研究表明考来烯胺治疗可延缓II型高脂蛋白血症患者CAD的进展速度。