Nalesnik M A, Rabin B S
Am J Clin Pathol. 1984 Feb;81(2):192-7. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/81.2.192.
Antinuclear antibody tests were performed on 19 patients using both the indirect immunofluorescence procedure (FANA) and the avidin-biotin conjugated immunoperoxidase technic (ABC) on HEp-2 cells. Pearson r between the two tests was 0.73. Identical patterns were seen in only 53% of cases, due partially to the chromogen used and partially to positive staining with the ABC method in the face of negative results using the FANA. Reasons are presented to suggest that the ABC method is capable of detecting low-level autoantibodies. Because of the discrepancies seen, the ABC method is currently not recommended as a substitute for the FANA in a clinical setting.
对19例患者进行了抗核抗体检测,采用间接免疫荧光法(FANA)和抗生物素蛋白-生物素共轭免疫过氧化物酶技术(ABC)检测HEp-2细胞。两种检测方法之间的Pearson相关系数为0.73。仅53%的病例出现相同的模式,部分原因是所用的显色剂,部分原因是ABC法呈阳性染色而FANA法结果为阴性。文中给出了相关理由,表明ABC法能够检测低水平自身抗体。鉴于所观察到的差异,目前不建议在临床环境中用ABC法替代FANA法。