Taylor D G, Baron P A, Shulman S A, Carter J W
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1984 Feb;45(2):84-8. doi: 10.1080/15298668491399415.
A combined analytical electron microscopic/optical count method for the determination of airborne asbestos fibers was tested for precision and bias. A modified phase contrast microscopic count method (NIOSH Method 7400) was used to determine total fiber content. The analytical electron microscope (AEM) procedure was added to identify the fraction of amosite asbestos fibers in airborne, laboratory-generated samples containing amosite and wollastonite fibers. Then this fraction was applied to the routine optical counts of all the samples in the set to estimate the asbestos fiber concentration. The effects of sample to sample, wedge to wedge, within wedge and between and counter variability were examined. In addition, the variabilities of the elemental ratio within a fiber and between fibers was also determined to find their possible influence on the ability to identify the fiber as amosite in the presence of other silicate fibers. A precision of 20.1% relative standard deviation (RSD) and a bias of -9.1% for the AEM count method compared with the optical count procedure were found for these mixed fiber samples.
一种用于测定空气中石棉纤维的电子显微镜/光学计数联合分析方法进行了精密度和偏差测试。采用一种改进的相差显微镜计数法(NIOSH方法7400)来测定总纤维含量。添加了分析电子显微镜(AEM)程序,以识别含有铁石棉和硅灰石纤维的实验室生成的空气中样品中铁石棉纤维的比例。然后将该比例应用于该组所有样品的常规光学计数,以估算石棉纤维浓度。研究了样品间、楔块间、楔块内以及计数间的变异性。此外,还测定了纤维内和纤维间元素比例的变异性,以确定它们在存在其他硅酸盐纤维的情况下对将纤维识别为铁石棉的能力的可能影响。对于这些混合纤维样品,发现AEM计数法相对于光学计数程序的相对标准偏差(RSD)为20.1%,偏差为-9.1%。