Solomon J, Rouck L A, Koepke H H
Clin Ther. 1983;6(1):52-8.
The anxiolytic efficacy and safety of lorazepam and chlordiazepoxide were evaluated and compared during a five-day double-blind trial in 50 male inpatients who were experiencing acute alcohol withdrawal symptoms. The total daily doses of lorazepam and chlordiazepoxide were tapered from 6 to 2 mg and from 150 to 50 mg, respectively, during the first four days; no medication was given on day 5. Drug effectiveness was measured by improvements in the total severity assessment score (TSAS), in the three composite TSAS factors, and by the physician's global rating. No drug-related adverse effects occurred during treatment. Vital signs remained stable, and laboratory test results remained within normal limits. The results indicate that lorazepam was as effective as chlordiazepoxide in reducing the symptoms of acute alcohol withdrawal. Because of its simpler and more predictable metabolic pathway and its insignificant accumulation in plasma during multiple-dose therapy, lorazepam may be the drug of choice if benzodiazepine therapy is required for chronic alcoholics with acute withdrawal symptoms.
在一项为期五天的双盲试验中,对50名出现急性酒精戒断症状的男性住院患者评估并比较了劳拉西泮和氯氮卓的抗焦虑疗效及安全性。在前四天,劳拉西泮和氯氮卓的每日总剂量分别从6毫克减至2毫克和从150毫克减至50毫克;第5天未给药。通过总严重程度评估评分(TSAS)、TSAS的三个综合因素以及医生的整体评分的改善来衡量药物疗效。治疗期间未发生与药物相关的不良反应。生命体征保持稳定,实验室检查结果保持在正常范围内。结果表明,劳拉西泮在减轻急性酒精戒断症状方面与氯氮卓同样有效。由于其代谢途径更简单且更可预测,并且在多剂量治疗期间在血浆中无明显蓄积,对于有急性戒断症状的慢性酗酒者,如果需要苯二氮卓类药物治疗,劳拉西泮可能是首选药物。