Sullivan I D, Wainwright R J, Reidy J F, Sowton E
Br Heart J. 1984 Jun;51(6):643-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.51.6.643.
In a prospective double blind randomised study in 25 consecutive patients a conventional ionic contrast medium (Urografin 370) was compared with the new non-ionic medium iohexol 350 ( Omnipaque ) in left ventriculography and coronary arteriography. In left ventriculography there was a clear patient preference for iohexol by both a visual analogue scale and independent observer assessment. Iohexol also induced a smaller increase in heart rate or decrease in systolic blood pressure than Urografin. In coronary arteriography iohexol resulted in a smaller reduction in heart rate and systolic blood pressure, a smaller maximum increase in RR interval, less prolongation of the PQ and QT intervals and QRS duration, and a lower incidence of induced chest pain, ST segment depression, or T wave deflection.
在一项针对25例连续患者的前瞻性双盲随机研究中,将传统离子型造影剂(泛影葡胺370)与新型非离子型造影剂碘海醇350(欧乃派克)用于左心室造影和冠状动脉造影进行比较。在左心室造影中,通过视觉模拟评分法和独立观察者评估,患者明显更倾向于碘海醇。与泛影葡胺相比,碘海醇引起的心率增加或收缩压降低幅度更小。在冠状动脉造影中,碘海醇导致心率和收缩压降低幅度更小,RR间期最大增加幅度更小,PQ和QT间期及QRS时限延长更少,诱发胸痛、ST段压低或T波改变的发生率更低。